Latest Posts › DE Supreme Court

Share:

Delaware Supreme Court Confirms Dual MFW Protections Are Needed Outside of the Freeze-Out Merger Context for Application of...

In In re Match Group, Inc. Derivative Litigation, the Delaware Supreme Court held that the dual procedural protections announced in the seminal case of Kahn v. M & F Worldwide Corp. (MFW) are required in order to shift the...more

Delaware Supreme Court Addresses Increasingly Common Choice of Law Issue in New Context — Directors' and Officers' Liability...

In a recent decision, the Supreme Court of the State of Delaware (Supreme Court) affirmed a ruling of the Superior Court of the State of Delaware (Superior Court) that Delaware has a more significant relationship than...more

Fraud on the Board: Material Conflicts Must Be Disclosed to the Board to Warrant Business Judgment Review

A recent decision by the Delaware Supreme Court emphasizes the importance of fully disclosing material director and officer conflicts of interest in connection with proposed M&A transactions. Indeed, as the Court’s ruling...more

Fiduciary Duty Of Disclosure Does Not Apply To Individual Transactions With Equityholders

In Dohmen v. Goodman, the Delaware Supreme Court declined to impose an affirmative fiduciary duty of disclosure on a general partner arising out of the general partner’s solicitation of capital contributions from a limited...more

Delaware Supreme Court Affirms Historic Material Adverse Effect Ruling

On December 7, 2018, the Delaware Supreme Court issued an order affirming the judgment of the Court of Chancery in Akorn, Inc. v. Fresenius Kabi AG, C.A. No. 2018-0300-JTL (Del. Ch. Oct. 1, 2018). ...more

5 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide