The Florida Supreme Court ruled that PIP (Personal Injury Protection) insurers may pay 80% of a charge submitted by a provider, even when that reimbursement amount is less than the amount that would be reimbursable under the...more
6/27/2024
/ Bodily Injury ,
Commercial General Liability Policies ,
Commercial Property Owners ,
Duty of Care ,
First-Party Coverage ,
FL Supreme Court ,
Insurance Claims ,
Insurance Industry ,
Insurance Litigation ,
NJ Supreme Court ,
PIP Coverage ,
Premises Liability ,
Property Damage ,
Purchasers ,
Third-Party
The steel contractor named the general contractor an additional insured on its CGL policy. The steel contractor's welds were defective. The general contractor retrofitted the named insured's defective columns before they...more
Some jurisdictions consider the ISO-form "bodily injury" definition to be ambiguous as to whether emotional distress requires physical harm to be bodily injury. Many insurers have amended bodily injury to expressly require a...more