Latest Posts › Intellectual Property Protection

Share:

Copyright Office Seeking Comment on Human Authorship Requirements for AI-Generated Works

On the heels of one of the first district court decisions that denied a copyright for AI-generated work that entirely lacked human authorship and left open the question of what level of human intervention will be required in...more

AI-Generated Works Cannot Be Copyrighted Because They Lack Human Authorship

One of the hot-button issues that generative artificial intelligence (AI) has raised is whether works created by AI engines are copyrightable. In one of the first decisions on this issue, the D.C. District Court recently...more

China Enacts Groundbreaking Regulations To Vet Generative AI — Will Other Nations Follow Suit?

Some of the world’s earliest and most detailed governmental regulations for generative artificial intelligence (AI) just went into effect in China on Aug. 15. These “Generative AI Measures” are intended to balance state...more

DC District Court Provides Guidance as to the Meaning of ‘Protein’ Under the BPCIA

In December 2020, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued a decision in Teva v. FDA, reviewing FDA’s definition of “protein” in connection with the agency’s determination that Teva’s Copaxone®, a...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide