In BSG Tech LLC v. BuySeasons, Inc., the Federal Circuit held that a patent claim is ineligible under § 101 when its only allegedly unconventional feature is an abstract idea. The Federal Circuit affirmed the judgment of the...more
Federal Circuit Summary -
Before Reyna, Bryson, and Hughes. Appeal from the Northern District of California.
Summary: Breach of a duty of disclosure to a standards-setting organization may constitute implied waiver,...more
8/23/2018
/ Appeals ,
Apple ,
Breach of Duty ,
Duty to Disclose ,
ETSI ,
Finland ,
Implied Waivers ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patents ,
Remand ,
Standard Setting Organizations ,
Technology ,
Vacated ,
Waivers ,
Willful Misconduct
In Core Wireless Licensing S.A.R.L. v. LG Electronics, Inc., the Federal Circuit held that user interface claims are patent eligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101 because they “recite a specific improvement over prior systems,...more
Federal Circuit Summaries -
Before Moore, Plager, and Stoll. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.
Summary: In challenging compliance with the marking requirement of §...more
12/20/2017
/ § 287 ,
Appeals ,
Burden-Shifting ,
IP License ,
License Agreements ,
Motion for JMOL ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Marking ,
Patent-in-Suit ,
Patents ,
Remand ,
Vacated
The Federal Circuit determined that Article III standing was not necessary for an appellee to participate in a judicial appeal of an IPR final written decision because the appellant had Article III standing in Personal Audio,...more
8/18/2017
/ Administrative Proceedings ,
Appeals ,
Appellate Rules ,
Article III ,
Electronic Frontier Foundation ,
Final Written Decisions ,
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding ,
Judicial Review ,
Patent Invalidity ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Patents ,
Standing