Latest Publications

Share:

Q3 2024 Quarterly Corporate / M&A decisions updates

Below is our Corporate / M&A decisions update covering decisions in the third quarter of 2024. Decisions from the Delaware Court of Chancery this quarter included an analysis of the assignment for the benefit of creditors...more

Gilbert v. Unisys: The Court of Chancery grants advancement to unelected officers

In Gilbert v. Unisys Corp., the Delaware Court of Chancery held that two former employees with the title of Vice President were entitled to advancement of litigation expenses brought by the corporation, despite the fact that...more

Delaware court finds corporate charter cannot incorporate private agreement by reference

In Seavitt v. N-able, 321 A.3d 516 (Del. Ch. 2024), decided prior to the amendment of the Delaware General Corporate law to add Section 122(18), the Delaware Court of Chancery held that the “public nature of a charter” means...more

In re Wack Jills: Delaware decision marks the end of Wild West ABC proceedings

In a recent opinion in an assignment for the benefit of creditors (ABC) proceeding, the Delaware Court of Chancery provided an illustrative account of the assignee’s failures to comply with the relevant statutory scheme, and...more

Q2 2024 Quarterly Corporate / M&A decisions updates

Below is our Corporate / M&A decisions update covering decisions in the second quarter of 2024. Decisions from the Delaware Court of Chancery this quarter included further development of the jurisprudence around the validity...more

BuzzFeed II: Court enforces arbitration clauses in employment agreements with pre-SPAC entity

In BuzzFeed Media Enterprises, Inc. v. Anderson, No. 2023-0377, 2024 WL 2187054 (Del. Ch. May 15, 2024) (BuzzFeed II), the Delaware Court of Chancery held that BuzzFeed Media Enterprises (BME) was bound by arbitration...more

Delaware Court of Chancery dismisses “De-SPAC” merger claims at motion to dismiss stage

In In re Hennessy Capital Acquisition Corp. IV Stockholder Litigation, the Delaware Court of Chancery for the first time dismissed breach of fiduciary duty claims against directors involved in a merger with a special purpose...more

In re Cognizant Technology: Third Circuit adopts de novo review for failure to plead demand futility

In re Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation Derivative Litigation, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, sitting en banc, overruled its prior decision in Blasband v. Rales that applied an...more

Wagner v. BRP: The Court of Chancery extends its Moelis stockholders agreement jurisprudence

In Wagner v. BRP Group Inc., the Delaware Court of Chancery further developed its jurisprudence regarding the validity of stockholders agreements that vest significant control rights in minority stockholders instead of a...more

Court rulings put implementation of Department of Labor Fiduciary Rule on hold

Two federal district courts in Texas have issued orders staying the implementation of the United States Department of Labor’s (DOL) 2024 Fiduciary Rule (the Final Rule) and related prohibited transaction exemption amendments....more

Delaware Supreme Court clarifies entire fairness standard for controlling stockholder transactions

In In re Match Group Deriv. Litig., the Delaware Supreme Court affirmed in part and reversed in part the lower court’s decision on the appropriate standard of review and the application of Kahn v. M & F Worldwide Corp., 88...more

Clem v. Skinner: Court dismisses Caremark claims and warns of claims “doing more harm than good”

In Clem et al. v. Skinner, the Delaware Court of Chancery granted a motion Caremark claims against the directors of Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.’s for failure to plead demand futility. The court found that demand was not...more

Palkon v. Maffei: Court permits suit challenging conversion to Nevada corporation

In Palkon v. Maffei, the Delaware Court of Chancery permitted stockholders to pursue claims that the board of directors of TripAdvisor breached their fiduciary duties in converting TripAdvisor from a Delaware corporation to a...more

Goldstein v. Denner: Delaware Court of Chancery imposes sanctions for spoliation of evidence

In Goldstein v. Denner, the Delaware Court of Chancery imposed sanctions pursuant to Court of Chancery Rule 37(e) in light of the defendants’ failure to preserve text messages. The court found that the defendants acted at...more

6/10/2024  /  Discovery , Mergers , Sanctions , Spoliation , Stays

Delaware Supreme Court holds separate class vote not required for officer exculpation amendment

In re Fox Corporation/Snap Inc. Section 242 Litigation, the Delaware Supreme Court ruled that corporations do not need to seek votes from each separate stockholder class to approve charter amendments exculpating corporate...more

2024 Securities, Shareholder, and M&A Litigation Outlook

2023 was a busy year, with both the Delaware courts and others, including the U.S. Supreme Court, weighing in on shareholder and M&A litigation issues. The Delaware Court of Chancery issued several notable decisions on issues...more

Q4 2023 Quarterly Corporate / M&A decisions updates

This quarter, Delaware courts issued several notable opinions in unique contexts. For example, in a rare reversal, the Delaware Supreme Court rejected the Court of Chancery’s use of “judicial notice” of another court’s ruling...more

Lebanon County v. Collis: Delaware Supreme Court reverses dismissal of Caremark claims

In Lebanon County Employees’ Retirement Fund v. Collis, the Delaware Supreme Court reversed the Delaware Court of Chancery’s dismissal of Caremark claims against the directors of AmerisourceBergen Corporation that arose from...more

Pietrasik v. Kraus Hamdani Aerospace: Despite Plaintiff’s “Rancor,” Delaware Court Grants 220 Demand

After a de novo review of the record following a Magistrate in Chancery’s final report, Vice Chancellor Fioravanti of the Delaware Court of Chancery declined to accept the Magistrate’s recommendation to deny a...more

Segway, Inc. v. Cai – Delaware Chancery Court reaffirms Caremark bad faith requirement

In Segway, Inc. v. Cai, the Delaware Court of Chancery dismissed a breach of fiduciary duty claim for failure to allege “sufficient facts to support a reasonable inference that the fiduciary acted in bad faith.” The plaintiff...more

Texas Pacific: Following Trial, Delaware Court Rules Investors Violated Stockholders Agreement

In Texas Pacific Land Corporation v. Horizon Kinetics LLC, the Delaware Court of Chancery ruled in a post-trial opinion that investors violated a stockholders agreement by failing to vote in favor of a board proposal to...more

Q3 2023 Quarterly Corporate / M&A decisions updates

The Delaware courts issued a range of decisions this quarter, addressing topics from mootness fees to demand futility. Two key opinions addressed compliance with Delaware statute and court orders. In Seidman, the court...more

Newman v. KKR: Suit dismissed by Delaware Chancery Court for failure to plead demand futility

In Newman v. KKR, the Delaware Court of Chancery dismissed a shareholder suit against Transphorm, Inc.’s Board and KKR, the largest shareholder, for failure to plead demand futility. The plaintiff alleged that the Board...more

Seidman v. Blue Foundry: eregious defense against books and record request prompts fee shifting

In Lawrence B. Seidman v. Blue Foundry Bancorp, the Delaware Court of Chancery awarded US$223,651.60 in attorneys’ fees and expenses to a plaintiff stockholder because of the defendant’s “glaringly egregious litigation...more

Q1 2023 Quarterly Corporate / M&A decisions updates

M&A and shareholder litigation is off to a busy start in 2023, with Delaware courts issuing several interesting opinions. The Delaware Supreme Court reversed a Delaware Court of Chancery decision, finding that the “maximum...more

28 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide