Latest Posts › USPTO

Share:

USPTO Drops Proposal to Change Terminal Disclaimer Practice

On May 10, 2024, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) regarding terminal disclaimer practice.  The proposed rule would have required any terminal disclaimer filed to obviate...more

USPTO Institutes Additional Fees for Large Information Disclosure Statement Filings

The advice to practitioners faced with marginally relevant prior art has long been "when in doubt, cite it."  There was a small cost for the applicant (or practitioner) to cite such art by filing an information disclosure...more

ABA Issues Formal Ethics Opinion on Use of Generative AI Tools

Following in the footsteps of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and the state bars of California, Florida, New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania, the American Bar Association has weighed in on attorneys' ethical use of...more

Former Directors Request Rescission of Proposed Rule Change

As discussed previously on this blog (see "USPTO Proposed Rule Change to Terminal Disclaimer Practice" and "The USPTO's Proposed Terminal Disclaimer Rule: A Litigator's Perspective") and elsewhere, the U.S. Patent and...more

The USPTO's Proposed Terminal Disclaimer Rule: A Litigator's Perspective

As discussed at length in a previous post on this blog (see "USPTO Proposed Rule Change to Terminal Disclaimer Practice"), the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has proposed amending the form of terminal disclaimer to be used...more

The USPTO's Guidance on Use of AI-based Tools in Practice

Since President Biden issued his Executive Order on the Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has been investigating the potential pitfalls of...more

USPTO Updates Service Methods for Notices of Appeal and Related Documents

In a Federal Register notice dated March 29, 2024, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is updating the required method for serving it with a notice of appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, a notice of...more

USPTO Provides Guidance on PTAB Discretionary Denials of Challenges Based on Parallel Litigation

On June 22, 2022, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office issued two documents regarding the Patent Trial and Appeals Board's discretionary denials of post-grant challenges based on parallel litigation: a retrospective study of...more

Peter v. NantKwest, Inc. (2019)

Supreme Court Rejects USPTO's Attempt to Recover Attorney's Fees in All District Court "Appeals" from PTAB Decisions - In Peter v. NantKwest, Inc., decided by the U.S. Supreme Court, the Court considered whether the U.S....more

U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Require Applicants to Pay USPTO’s Attorney Fees in District Court “Appeals” of Prosecution Decisions

A patent applicant dissatisfied with a decision by the USPTO’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) has two options for review of that decision. Most commonly—by far—the applicant can appeal the decision to the U.S. Court...more

USPTO Issues Proposed Rules on Burden of Proof for Motions to Amend in Post-Grant Proceedings

When post-grant proceedings under the America Invents Act began, the USPTO's Patent Trial and Appeals Board ("PTAB") treated motions to amend in those proceedings like most other motions:  the movant, here the patentee, bore...more

Power Integrations, Inc. v. Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC (Fed. Cir. 2019)

In this case, the question ultimately answered by the Federal Circuit was a straightforward question of statutory interpretation:  in determining whether a party is time-barred from filing a petition for inter partes review...more

AVX  Corp. v. Presidio Components, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2019)

AVX Corporation and Presidio Components are long-standing competitors in the market for electronic components, including capacitors. Their competition has caused animosity, which in turn has resulted in patent infringement...more

Supreme Court Grants Certiorari in Iancu v. NantKwest, Inc.

On the same day that the Supreme Court decided what the term "full costs" means under the Copyright Act, it granted certiorari to consider what "all the expenses of [a district court review] proceeding" means under the Patent...more

Supreme Court to Decide if Government Can Bring AIA Proceedings

On Friday, October 26, 2018, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Return Mail, Inc. v. U.S. Postal Service, in order to answer the question whether the government can bring post-grant review proceedings under the...more

PTAB Adopts Litigation Standards for Claim Construction in AIA Proceedings

Under a new PTO administrative rule published today, October 11, 2018, the PTAB will apply the same claim construction standards in IPRs, PGRs, and CBMs filed on November 13, 2018 or later as would apply in litigation. 83...more

ABA Provides Guidance on Required Disclosure of Attorney Errors

On April 17th, the American Bar Association provided a formal opinion regarding the requirement that attorneys disclose errors to clients. Its opinion was based on Rule 1.4 of the Model Rules of Professional Conduct, which...more

USPTO Issues Final Rule Establishing Patent Agent Privilege

Earlier on November 7, 2017, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("PTAB") published its Final Rule establishing the attorney-client privilege for application in PTAB proceedings. Before the...more

Nantkwest, Inc. v. Matal (Fed. Cir. 2017)

Patent applicants dissatisfied with final outcome of patent prosecution proceedings have long had two options for court review of a Patent and Trademark Appeal Board decision: an appeal to the Federal Circuit under 35 U.S.C....more

MBHB Snippets: A review of developments in Intellectual Property Law - Volume 15, Issue 1

In 2011, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (“AIA”) established new post-issuance procedures for challenging the validity of a granted patent before the Patent Trials and Appeal Board (“PTAB” or “Board”). Inter partes...more

MBHB Snippets: Review of Developments in Intellectual Property Law: Fall 2014 - Vol. 12, Issue 4

In This Issue: - Prior Art Redefined Under the AIA - PTAB Holds a Firm Line on Additional Discovery - The Art of Prior Art Searching - Anticipating a Federal Trade Secret Law - Trademark...more

MBHB Snippets: Review of Developments in Intellectual Property Law - Spring 2013 - Volume 11, Issue 2

In This Issue: Comments on New AIA Rules; Implementing the New Micro Entity Status at the U.S. Patent Office; Obama Administration Focuses on Chinese Trade Secret Misappropriation; and Tiffany & Co. v. Costco Wholesale...more

22 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide