Drazen v. GoDaddy.com, LLC, No. 21-10199 (11th Cir. July 27, 2022)
Plaintiffs’ Claims and Allegations -
Plaintiff’s claims, and those advanced in two separately filed class action lawsuits alleging violation of the...more
St. Louis Heart Center, Inc. v. Nomax, Inc., No. 19-1794, 2018 WL 3719694 (8th Cir. Aug. 6, 2018) -
Plaintiff filed a class action lawsuit in state court, alleging Defendant sent it 12 fax advertisements without including...more
8/7/2018
/ Advertising ,
Appeals ,
Article III ,
Class Action ,
Injury-in-Fact ,
Invasion of Privacy ,
Motion to Dismiss ,
Opt-Outs ,
Regulatory Violations ,
Remand ,
Removal ,
Standing ,
TCPA ,
Unsolicited Faxes
Plaintiff filed suit, placing at issue a single call to his cell phone using an ATDS, and attempting to represent a class of similarly situated individuals. The only allegation in the Complaint arguably relating to injury was...more
10/12/2016
/ Article III ,
ATDS ,
Auto-Dialed Calls ,
Cell Phones ,
Dismissal With Prejudice ,
First Amendment ,
Injury-in-Fact ,
Robocalling ,
Standing ,
TCPA ,
Telecommunications
Romero v. Department Stores National Bank, 15-cv-193-CAB-MDD (S.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2016) -
On the eve of trial, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s claims for lack of standing relying on the Supreme Court case of Spokeo v....more
In a 6-2 decision authored by Justice Samuel Alito, the United States Supreme Court spoke on the issue of standing when statutory violations are alleged, and its opinion could have profound effects on TCPA litigation. Holding...more