Practitioners’ hopes (or fears) that the Supreme Court would clarify what constitutes patent-eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101 were dashed in May when the Supreme Court denied certiorari in Interactive Wearables,...more
Kilpatrick Townsend partners Megan Bussey and Karam J. Saab recently presented “35 U.S.C. § 101 in 2023 - Prosecution and Litigation Perspectives” at the firm’s annual three-day “Ski-LE” in Colorado.
Five key takeaways on...more
Kilpatrick Townsend partners Gene Bernard and Karam J. Saab recently presented “Ethics in Patent Prosecution” at the firm’s three-day CLE & Ski Series, KT Intellectual Property Seminar (KTIPS), in Colorado.
5 key...more
Subject matter eligibility rejections under 35 U.S.C. §101 have plagued applicants in numerous technology fields since the Supreme Court’s Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International decision in 2014. Over the next few years, a...more
Kilpatrick Townsend Partner Karam J. Saab offers five key takeaways describing the effects of Berkheimer v. HP Inc. (881 F.3d 1360) in subsequent PTAB decisions and how it is benefiting patent applicants.
...more
Kilpatrick Townsend Partners Eugenia Garrett-Wackowski, Paul Haughey, Babak Kusha, and Karam Saab recently presented on issues and strategies to consider when writing and prosecuting patent applications to withstand Alice...more