PARUS HOLDINGS, INC. V. GOOGLE LLC -
Before Lourie, Bryson, and Reyna. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: PTAB did not err in declining to consider...more
LG ELECTRONICS INC. v. IMMERVISION INC.
Before Stoll, Cunningham, and Newman, Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: Where a reference contains an “obvious”...more
7/13/2022
/ Appeals ,
Clerical Errors ,
Intellectual Property Protection ,
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding ,
LG Electronics ,
Obviousness ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Patents ,
POSITA
ASTRAZENECA AB v. MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
Before: Taranto, Hughes, and Stoll -
Summary: For purposes of claim construction, intrinsic evidence can trump the plain and ordinary meaning of scientific conventions such...more
COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. DALI WIRELESS INC.
Before Stoll, Reyna, and Schall. Appeal from U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas.
Summary: When a party distinguishes technology in the prior art to...more
In Re FORNEY INDUSTRIES, INC.
Before Dyk, O’Malley, and Chen. Appeal from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: Multi-colored marks may be inherently distinctive when used on product packaging....more