Latest Posts › Patents

Share:

Non-Prior Art Evidence May Be Used to Prove Inherency

HOSPIRA, INC. V. FRESENIUS KABI USA, LLC - Before Lourie, Dyk, and Moore.  Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Summary:  Evidence of the properties of claimed embodiments may be...more

Specification’s Narrow Description of the Invention Results in Disavowal of Claim Scope

TECHTRONIC INDUSTRIES CO. LTD. v. ITC - Before Lourie, Dyk, and Wallach. Appeal from the U.S. International Trade Commission. Summary: Consistent description in the specification of a particular embodiment as the...more

Publication Shelved in Publicly Accessible Library Was Accessible to the Public and Therefore Available as Prior Art

TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON v. TCL CORPORATION - Before NEWMAN, LOURIE, and CLEVENGER. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary:  Publications shelved in publicly accessible libraries may be publicly...more

Costs Awarded to Defendant After Case Dismissed for Mootness

B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C. v. FACEBOOK, INC. Before Lourie, Plager, and O’Malley. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee. Summary: A decision on the merits is not a prerequisite...more

Federal Court Lacked Jurisdiction over Contract Dispute Implicating Patent Infringement

INSPIRED DEVELOPMENT GROUP v. INSPIRED PRODUCTS GROUP, LLC - Before Prost, Newman, and Stoll.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Summary: Alleging that a contract issue...more

An Improper Reply to a Final Office Action May Result in the Accrual of Applicant Delay for PTA Calculations

INTRA-CELLULAR THERAPIES, INC v. IANCU - Before Wallach, Chen, and Hughes.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Summary:  If a proper reply to a final Office Action is not...more

A “Substantially Equivalent” Disclosure May Satisfy the Written Description Requirement

NALPROPION PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. ACTAVIS LABORATORIES FL, INC. Before Prost, Lourie and Wallach. Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware. Summary: A “substantially equivalent” disclosure may...more

The Doctrine of Equivalents May Apply Despite Restriction Requirements and Narrow Claiming

UCB, INC. v. WATSON LABORATORIES INC. Before Taranto, Schall, and Chen. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. Summary: Application of the doctrine of equivalents may not be barred...more

Grunenthal GMBH v. Alkem Laboratories Limited

Before Judges Reyna, Taranto, and Chen. Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. Summary: There may be no reasonable expectation of success in producing a specific polymorph of a compound when...more

ENDO Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. TEVA Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.

Before Wallach, Clevenger, and Stoll. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. Summary: Claims directed to a specific method of treatment for specific patients using a specific compound...more

Chargepoint, Inc. v. Semaconnect, Inc.

Federal Circuit Summary - Before Prost, Reyna, and Taranto. Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland. Summary: An abstract idea cannot be used to supply an inventive concept that renders a claim...more

Duncan Parking Technologies v. IPS Group, Inc.

Federal Circuit Summary - Before Lourie, Dyk and Taranto. Consolidated Appeals from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board and the Southern District of California. Summary: A person is a joint inventor of the anticipating...more

The Supreme Court Holds that Non-Public Sales May Trigger the On Sale Bar Under the America Invents Act

On Tuesday, January 22, 2019, the U.S. Supreme Court held in a unanimous decision that, even where the details of the invention are kept confidential, a commercial sale may place the invention “on sale” under the Leahy-Smith...more

Spineology, Inc., v. Wright Medical Technology Inc.

Federal Circuit Summary - Before Prost, Dyk and Moore. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. Summary: A party’s continued, but ultimately unsuccessful, pursuit of a claim...more

Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc. v. F'Real Foods, LLC

Federal Circuit Summary - Before Reyna, Wallach, and Taranto. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: A party must file a cross-appeal when their argument requires modification of a decision. Under the...more

Ancora Technologies, Inc. v. HTC America, Inc.

Federal Circuit Summaries - Before Dyk, Wallach, and Taranto. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. Summary: Claims directed to improving computer security by using BIOS...more

Yeda Research And Development Co., Ltd. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. & Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Sandoz Inc.

Federal Circuit Summary - Before Judges Reyna, Bryson, and Stoll. Appeals from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board and the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. Summary: Non-prior art evidence may...more

Worlds Inc. V. Bungie, Inc.

Federal Circuit Summary - Before Prost, O’Malley, and Taranto. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: The PTAB may initially accept an IPR petitioner’s identification of real-parties-in-interest, but...more

In Re Maatita

Federal Circuit Summary - Before Dyk, Reyna, and Stoll. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: A two-dimensional drawing of a three-dimensional object may meet the enablement and definiteness...more

SAP America, Inc. v. InvestPic, LLC

Federal Circuit Summary - Before Lourie, O’Malley, and Taranto. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Summary: Where remand of post-reexamination claims that issued during the...more

Blackbird Tech LLC v. ELB Electronics, Inc.

Federal Circuit Summary - Before Prost, Moore and Reyna. Appeal from the District Court of Delaware. Summary: A limitation in the specification should not be imported into a claim when there is no evidence that the...more

Power Integrations, Inc., v. Fairchild Semiconductor

Federal Circuit Summaries - Before Dyk, Clevenger, and Chen. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Summary: In order to rely on the entire market value rule to calculate...more

Medtronic, Inc. v. Barry

Federal Circuit Summaries - Before Taranto, Plager, and Chen. Appeal from the Patent Trials and Appeals Board. Summary: In determining whether materials distributed at meetings or conferences are reasonably accessible...more

Stone Basket Innovations, LLC v. Cook Medical, LLC

Federal Circuit Summaries - Before PROST, Wallach, and Taranto. Appeal from the Southern District of Indiana. Summary: In determining whether a party’s actions were “exceptional” under Octane Fitness, the District...more

D Three Enterprises, LLC v. Sunmodo Corporation

Federal Circuit Summaries - Before Reyna, Clevenger, and Wallach. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado - Summary: Even in a simple mechanical case, a narrow disclosure in the...more

60 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 3

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide