Katherine West

Burr & Forman

+ Follow Contact

Latest Posts › Robocalling

Share:

District of Kansas Holds a Device that Dials from Stored Customer Database is Not an ATDS

On April 13, 2020, the District Court of Kansas in Hampton v. Barclays Bank Delaware, No. 18-4071-DDC-ADM, 2020 WL 4698476 (D. Kan. Aug. 13, 2020), joined the Seventh and Eleventh Circuits in holding that devices that...more

8/18/2020 / ATDS , Auto-Dialed Calls , Robocalling , TCPA , Telecommunications

District Court of Minnesota Finds Calls to a Reassigned Number Did Not Violate the TCPA

In Roark v. Credit One Bank, N.A., No. 16-173 (PAM/ECW), 2018 WL 5921652 (D. Minn. Nov. 13, 2018), the District Court of Minnesota found that calls to a reassigned phone number did not violate the TCPA because the caller’s...more

11/19/2018 / ATDS , Auto-Dialed Calls , FCC , Financial Services Industry , Prior Express Consent , Reassigned Phone Numbers , Robocalling , TCPA , Telecommunications , Wireless Devices

Central District of California Finds ACA Set Aside All FCC Autodialer Guidance

In Washington v. Six Continents Hotels, Inc., No. 2:16-CV-03719-ODW-JEM, 2018 WL 4092024 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2018), the Central District of California found that ACA International v. FCC, 885 F.3d 687 (D.C. Cir. 2018)...more

9/5/2018 / ATDS , Auto-Dialed Calls , FCC , Prior Express Consent , Robocalling , TCPA , Telecommunications , Text Messages , Vacated

Massachusetts District Court Finds VoIP Service is Not Cellular Service Per Se Under the TCPA

In Breda v. Cellco Partnership, No. 16-11512-DJC, 2017 WL 5586661 (D. Ma. Nov. 17, 2017), the plaintiff, Robin Breda (“Plaintiff”) claimed Cellco Partnership (“Cellco”) violated § 227(b)(1) of the Telephone Consumer...more

12/8/2017 / ATDS , Cell Phones , Robocalling , Summary Judgment , TCPA , Telecommunications , VoIP

4 Results

View per page

Page: of 1