Latest Posts › Pharmaceutical Patents

Share:

ANDA Approvals - Winter 2021

This chart tracks the date, drug, reference-listed company, and applicant of Abbreviated New Drug Applications and 505(b)(2) Applications receiving final approval by the FDA....more

Par Pharm., Inc. v. Hospira, Inc.

Adrenalin® (epinephrine injection) - Case Name: Par Pharm., Inc. v. Hospira, Inc., No. 2020-1273, 2020 WL 6846347 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 23, 2020) (Circuit Judges Dyk, Taranto, and Stoll presiding; Opinion by Taranto, J.)...more

Bracco Diagnostics Inc. v. Maia Pharms., Inc.

Kinevac® (sincalide) - Case Name: Bracco Diagnostics Inc. v. Maia Pharms., Inc., No. 2020-1387, 2020 WL 7393233 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 17, 2020) (Circuit Judges Lourie, Clevenger, and Chen presiding; Opinion by Lourie, J.)...more

Eli Lilly & Co. v. Apotex, Inc.

Alimta® (pemetrexed disodium) - Case Name: Eli Lilly & Co. v. Apotex, Inc., No. 2020-1328, 2020 WL 7490251 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 21, 2020) (Circuit Judges Prost, Bryson, and Stoll presiding; Opinion by Stoll, J.) (Appeal from...more

Takeda Pharms. U.S.A., Inc. v. Mylan Pharms. Inc.

Colcrys®/colchicine - Case Name: Takeda Pharms. U.S.A., Inc. v. Mylan Pharms. Inc., No. 2020-1407, -1417 (Fed. Cir. July 31, 2020) (Circuit Judges Prost, Newman, and Hughes presiding; Opinion by Prost, C.J.; Dissent by...more

IBSA Institut Biochimique, S.A. v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc.

Tirosint®/levothyroxine sodium - Case Name: IBSA Institut Biochimique, S.A. v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc., No. 2019-2400 (Fed. Cir. July 31, 2020) (Circuit Judges Prost, Reyna, and Hughes presiding; Opinion by Prost, C.J.)...more

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Aurobindo Pharma USA Inc.

Eliquis®/apixaban - Case Name: Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Aurobindo Pharma USA Inc., No. 17-374-LPS (Consolidated), 2020 WL 4500226 (D. Del. Aug. 5, 2020) (Stark, J.)...more

Sun Pharm. Indus. Ltd. v. Saptalis Pharms., LLC

Riomet®/metformin HCl - Case Name: Sun Pharm. Indus. Ltd. v. Saptalis Pharms., LLC, No. 18-648-WCB, 2020 WL 5077412 (D. Del. Aug. 6, 2020) (Bryson, J.)... Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Riomet® (metformin HCl);...more

Novartis Pharms. Corp. V. Accord Healthcare INC.

Case Name: Novartis Pharms. Corp. v. Accord Healthcare Inc., No. 18-1043-KAJ (D. Del. August 10, 2020) (Jordan, J.)... Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Gilenya® (fingolimod); U.S. Patent No. 9,187,405 (“the ’405...more

Noven Pharm., Inc. v. Amneal Pharms. LLC

Case Name: Noven Pharm., Inc. v. Amneal Pharms. LLC, No. 18-cv-00699 (D. Del. Sept. 2, 2020) (Stark, J.)... Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Minivelle® (estradiol); U.S. Patents Nos. 9,833,419 (“the ’419 patent”),...more

Biogen Int’l GmbH v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC

Case Name: Biogen Int’l GmbH v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC, Civ. No. 17-823 (MN), 2020 WL 5549084 (D. Del. Sept. 16, 2020) (Noreika, J.)... Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Tecfidera® (dimethyl fumarate (“DMF”)...more

New ANDA Cases - Fall 2020

Federal district court cases that are filed pursuant to the Hatch-Waxman Act - This chart summarizes the case name, presiding judge, drug, and patents-at-issue in all federal district court cases that are filed pursuant to...more

Generic Launches - Fall 2020

This chart tracks the date, drug, reference-listed company, applicant, and indications of publicly available drug launches resulting from Abbreviated New Drug Applications and 505(b)(2) Applications. ...more

ANDA Litigation Settlements - Fall 2020

Reported settlements in federal district court cases - This chart summarizes the case name, drug, patents-in-suit, and publicly available terms for reported settlements in federal district court cases that are filed...more

ANDA Approvals - Fall 2020

This chart tracks the date, drug, reference-listed company, and applicant of Abbreviated New Drug Applications and 505(b)(2) Applications receiving final approval by the FDA....more

Celgene Corp. v. Sun Pharma Global FZE

SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION UNDER THE HATCH-WAXMAN ACT DOES NOT REQUIRE (I) A PARAGRAPH IV CERTIFICATION BY THE ANDA HOLDER; OR (II) THE PATENTS-IN-SUIT TO BE LISTED IN THE ORANGE BOOK. Case Name: Celgene Corp. v. Sun...more

Valeant Pharms Int’l, Inc. v. Mylan Pharms Inc.

BECAUSE THE PRIOR ART TAUGHT OVERLAPPING PH RANGES AND STRUCTURALLY SIMILAR COMPOUNDS AS THOSE CLAIMED IN THE PATENT-IN-SUIT, THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT REVERSED SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NON-OBVIOUSNESS. Case Name: Valeant Pharms...more

Somaxon Pharma, Inc. v. Actavis Elizabeth LLC

THE COURT GRANTED DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO ENFORCE ITS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, FINDING THAT THE AGREEMENT WAS NOT ANTICOMPETITIVE AND IN VIOLATION OF ANTITRUST LAW. Case Name: Somaxon Pharma, Inc. v. Actavis Elizabeth LLC, No....more

Biogen Int'l GmbH v. Banner Life Scis. LLC

BECAUSE DEFENDANT’S NDA PRODUCT DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY SALT OR ESTER OF THE ACTIVE INGREDIENT IN PLAINTIFF’S REFERENCE DRUG, PATENT TERM EXTENSION DID NOT APPLY AND JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT WAS AFFIRMED. Case...more

Cephalon, Inc. v. Slayback Pharma Ltd.

THE COURT FOUND THAT DEFENDANTS HAD NOT MET THEIR CLEAR-AND-CONVINCING BURDEN OF PROVING THAT FORMULATION AND METHOD-OF-TREATMENTS PATENTS-IN-SUIT WERE OBVIOUS. Case Name: Cephalon, Inc. v. Slayback Pharma Ltd., No....more

Onyx Therapeutics, Inc. v. Cipla Ltd.

BECAUSE A POSA WOULD NOT HAVE SELECTED THE PRIOR-ART COMPOUND AS A “LEAD COMPOUND,” AND THERE WAS EVIDENCE THAT THE INVENTION MET AN UNMET NEED AND OVERCAME INDUSTRY SKEPTICISM, DEFENDANT FAILED TO PROVE THAT THE...more

Eagle Pharms. Inc. v. Slayback Pharma LLC

JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AFFIRMED WHEN DISCLOSURE-DEDICATION DOCTRINE BARRED PATENT OWNER’S CLAIMS FOR INFRINGEMENT UNDER THE DOCTRINE OF EQUIVALENTS. Case Name: Eagle Pharms. Inc. v. Slayback Pharma...more

Biogen Int’l GmbH v. Mylan Pharms. Inc.

AMENDING CLAIMS AND ADDING INVENTOR TO CLAIM NEW ASPECT OF INVENTION, WITHOUT AMENDING SPECIFICATION, RESULTS IN JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY FOR LACK OF WRITTEN DESCRIPTION. Case Name: Biogen Int’l GmbH v. Mylan Pharms. Inc.,...more

Ferring Pharms. Inc. v. Lupin Inc.

BECAUSE THE PROPOSED LABEL OF THE ANDA PRODUCT DID NOT CONTEMPLATE THE CLAIMED TIMEFRAME IN THE ASSERTED PATENT FOR ADMINISTERING THE DRUG, THE COURT GRANTED DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT ON THE...more

Adapt Pharma Operations Ltd. v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc.

BECAUSE A SKILLED ARTISAN WOULD HAVE RECOGNIZED THE LIMITATIONS OF ONE PRIOR-ART REFERENCE AND WOULD HAVE BEEN MOTIVATED TO SELECT THE TEACHINGS OF ANOTHER REFERENCE TO OVERCOME THEM, THE PATENTS-IN-SUIT WERE OBVIOUS. Case...more

181 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 8

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide