CyWee Group Ltd. v. ZTE (USA), Inc., et al., No. 2021-1855 (Fed. Cir. (PTAB) Jan. 18, 2024). Opinion by Prost, joined by Hughes and Stoll. ZTE filed an IPR petition challenging certain claims in a patent owned by CyWee....more
Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. v. Personal Genomics Taiwan, Inc., Nos. 2022-1410, -1554 (Fed. Cir. (PTAB) Jan. 9, 2024). Opinion by Taranto, joined by Prost and Hughes. PacBio filed two petitions for IPR, each...more
DexCom, Inc. v. Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc., et al., No. 2023-1795 (Fed. Cir. (D. Del.) Jan. 3, 2024). Opinion by Stoll, joined by Dyk and Hughes. DexCom and Abbott are competing manufacturers of continuous glucose monitoring...more
K-fee System GmbH v. Nespresso USA, Inc., No. 2022-2042 (Fed. Cir. (C.D. Cal.) Dec. 26, 2023). Opinion by Taranto, joined by Clevenger and Stoll. K-fee owns multiple patents that describe and claim coffee-machine portion...more
ParkerVision, Inc. v. Vidal, No. 2022-1548 (Fed. Cir. (PTAB) Dec. 15, 2023). Opinion by Chen, joined by Prost and Wallach. Intel filed an IPR petition challenging claims 1, 3, and 5 in a patent owned by ParkerVision relating...more
Purdue Pharma L.P., et al. v. Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc., et al., No. 2022-1482 (Fed. Cir. (PTAB) Nov. 21, 2023). Opinion by Dyk, joined by Hughes and Stoll. Purdue owns a patent directed to preventing the abuse of...more
Medtronic, Inc., et al. v. Teleflex Life Sciences Ltd., Nos. 2022-1721, -1722 (Fed. Cir. (PTAB) Nov. 16, 2023). Opinion by Lourie, joined by Prost and Chen. Medtronic filed two IPR petitions challenging certain claims in a...more
Actelion Pharmaceuticals LTD v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., No. 2022-1889 (Fed. Cir. (N.D. W. Va.) Nov. 6, 2023). Opinion by Stoll, joined by Reyna and Stark....more
Malvern Panalytical Inc. v. TA Instruments-Waters LLC, et al., No. 2022-1439 (Fed. Cir. (D. Del.) Nov. 1, 2023). Opinion by Prost, joined by Hughes and Cunningham. Waters sued Malvern for infringement of two patents directed...more
Netflix, Inc. v. DivX, LLC, Nos. 2022-1203, -1204 (Fed. Cir. (PTAB) Oct. 25, 2023). Opinion by Chen, joined by Linn. Dissenting opinion by Dyk. Netflix appealed two IPR final written decisions determining that Netflix failed...more
Cyntec Co. v. Chilisin Electronics Corp., et al., No. 2022-1873 (Fed. Cir. (N.D. Cal.) Oct. 16, 2023). Opinion by Stoll, joined by Moore and Cunningham. Cyntec sued Chilisin for infringement of two patents directed to molded...more
Finjan LLC v. SonicWall, Inc., No. 2022-1048 (Fed. Cir. (N.D. Cal.) Oct. 13, 2023). Opinion by Cunningham, joined by Reyna. Opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part by Bryson. Finjan sued SonicWall for infringement...more
Schwendimann v. Neenah, Inc., et al., Nos. 2022-1333, -1334, -1427, -1432 (Fed. Cir. (PTAB) Oct. 6, 2023). Opinion by Clevenger, joined by Prost and Cunningham....more
Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc. v. Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc., Nos. 2021-2299, -2338 (Fed. Cir. (S.D. Cal.) Sept. 15, 2023). Opinion by Prost, joined by Reyna and Hughes. Columbia sued Seirus for...more
A weekly summary of the precedential patent-related opinions issued by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the opinions designated precedential or informative by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board....more
A weekly summary of the precedential patent-related opinions issued by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the opinions designated precedential or informative by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board....more
A weekly summary of the precedential patent-related opinions issued by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the opinions designated precedential or informative by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board....more
A weekly summary of the precedential patent-related opinions issued by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the opinions designated precedential or informative by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board....more
A weekly summary of the precedential patent-related opinions issued by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the opinions designated precedential or informative by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board....more
A weekly summary of the precedential patent-related opinions issued by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the opinions designated precedential or informative by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board....more
A weekly summary of the precedential patent-related opinions issued by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the opinions designated precedential or informative by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board....more