Broadband iTV, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc., et al., No. 2023-1107 (Fed. Cir. (W.D. Tex.) Sept. 3, 2024). Opinion by Reyna, joined by Dyk and Stark. Broadband iTV sued Amazon for infringement of five patents directed to...more
Platinum Optics Technology Inc. v. Viavi Solutions Inc., No. 2023-1227 (Fed. Cir. (PTAB) Aug. 16, 2024). Opinion by Cecchi (sitting by designation), joined by Moore and Taranto....more
Voice Tech Corp. v. Unified Patents, LLC, No. 2022-2163 (Fed. Cir. (PTAB) Aug. 1, 2024). Opinion by Chen, joined by Lourie and Cunningham. Unified filed an IPR petition challenging a Voice Tech patent directed to using voice...more
ZyXEL Communications Corp. v. UNM Rainforest Innovations, Nos. 2022-2220, -2250 (Fed. Cir. (PTAB) July 22, 2024). Opinion by Dyk, joined by Prost and Stark. UNMRI owns a patent that relates to methods for constructing frame...more
Miller Mendel, Inc. v. City of Anna, Texas, Nos. 2022-1753, -1999 (Fed. Cir. (E.D. Tex.) July 18, 2024). Opinion by Cunningham, joined by Moore and Stoll. Miller Mendel sued City of Anna, Texas for infringement of a patent...more
LKQ Corp., et al. v. GM Global Technology Operations LLC, No. 2021-2348 (Fed. Cir. (PTAB) May 21, 2024). En banc opinion by Stoll, joined by Moore, Dyk, Prost, Reyna, Taranto, Chen, Hughes, and Stark. Concurring opinion by...more
Intellectual Tech LLC v. Zebra Technologies Corp., No. 2022-2207 (Fed. Cir. (W.D. Tex.) May 1, 2024). Opinion by Prost, joined by Taranto and Hughes. Intellectual Tech (IT) sued Zebra for patent infringement. Zebra moved to...more
Virtek Vision International ULC v. Assembly Guidance Systems, Inc. d/b/a Aligned Vision, Nos. 2022-1998, -2022 (Fed. Cir. (PTAB) Mar. 27, 2024). Opinion by Moore, joined by Hughes and Stark. Virtek owns a patent directed to...more
Chewy, Inc. v. International Business Machines Corp., No. 2022-1756 (Fed. Cir. (S.D.N.Y.) Mar. 5, 2024). Opinion by Moore, joined by Stoll and Cunningham. IBM owns two patents that generally relate to improvements in...more
Google LLC, et al. v. EcoFactor, Inc., Nos. 2022-1750, -1767 (Fed. Cir. (PTAB) Feb. 7, 2024). Opinion by Reyna, joined by Taranto and Stark. EcoFactor is the assignee of a patent directed to methods for reducing cycling...more
CyWee Group Ltd. v. ZTE (USA), Inc., et al., No. 2021-1855 (Fed. Cir. (PTAB) Jan. 18, 2024). Opinion by Prost, joined by Hughes and Stoll. ZTE filed an IPR petition challenging certain claims in a patent owned by CyWee....more
Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. v. Personal Genomics Taiwan, Inc., Nos. 2022-1410, -1554 (Fed. Cir. (PTAB) Jan. 9, 2024). Opinion by Taranto, joined by Prost and Hughes. PacBio filed two petitions for IPR, each...more
DexCom, Inc. v. Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc., et al., No. 2023-1795 (Fed. Cir. (D. Del.) Jan. 3, 2024). Opinion by Stoll, joined by Dyk and Hughes. DexCom and Abbott are competing manufacturers of continuous glucose monitoring...more
ParkerVision, Inc. v. Vidal, No. 2022-1548 (Fed. Cir. (PTAB) Dec. 15, 2023). Opinion by Chen, joined by Prost and Wallach. Intel filed an IPR petition challenging claims 1, 3, and 5 in a patent owned by ParkerVision relating...more
Medtronic, Inc., et al. v. Teleflex Life Sciences Ltd., Nos. 2022-1721, -1722 (Fed. Cir. (PTAB) Nov. 16, 2023). Opinion by Lourie, joined by Prost and Chen. Medtronic filed two IPR petitions challenging certain claims in a...more
Actelion Pharmaceuticals LTD v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., No. 2022-1889 (Fed. Cir. (N.D. W. Va.) Nov. 6, 2023). Opinion by Stoll, joined by Reyna and Stark....more
Netflix, Inc. v. DivX, LLC, Nos. 2022-1203, -1204 (Fed. Cir. (PTAB) Oct. 25, 2023). Opinion by Chen, joined by Linn. Dissenting opinion by Dyk. Netflix appealed two IPR final written decisions determining that Netflix failed...more
Cyntec Co. v. Chilisin Electronics Corp., et al., No. 2022-1873 (Fed. Cir. (N.D. Cal.) Oct. 16, 2023). Opinion by Stoll, joined by Moore and Cunningham. Cyntec sued Chilisin for infringement of two patents directed to molded...more
Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc. v. Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc., Nos. 2021-2299, -2338 (Fed. Cir. (S.D. Cal.) Sept. 15, 2023). Opinion by Prost, joined by Reyna and Hughes. Columbia sued Seirus for...more
In re: Cellect, LLC, Nos. 2022-1293, -1294, -1295, -1296 (Fed. Cir. (PTAB) Aug. 28, 2023). Opinion by Lourie, joined by Dyk and Reyna. Cellect owns four patents directed to devices (such as personal digital assistant devices...more
Volvo Penta of the Americas, LLC v. Brunswick Corp., No. 2022-1765 (Fed. Cir. (PTAB) Aug. 24, 2023). Opinion by Lourie, joined by Moore and Cunningham. Brunswick filed an IPR petition challenging the claims of a patent...more
Incept LLC v. Palette Life Sciences, Inc., Nos. 2021-2063, -2065 (Fed. Cir. (PTAB) Aug. 16, 2023). Opinion by Schall, joined by Taranto. Opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part by Newman. Incept owns two patents...more
Axonics, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc., Nos. 2022-1532, -1533 (Fed. Cir. (PTAB) Aug. 7, 2023). Opinion by Dyk, joined by Lourie and Taranto. Axonics filed IPR petitions challenging claims in two Medtronic patents directed to...more
United Therapeutics Corp. v. Liquidia Technologies, Inc., Nos. 2022-2217, 2023-1021 (Fed. Cir. (D. Del.) July 24, 2023). Opinion by Lourie, joined by Dyk and Stoll. United Therapeutics sued Liquidia for infringement of two...more
A weekly summary of the precedential patent-related opinions issued by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the opinions designated precedential or informative by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board....more