On June 20, 2016, the full Federal Circuit denied Mylan’s petitions for rehearing en banc in Acorda Therapeutics Inc. v. Mylan Pharms. Inc., 817 F.3d 755 (Fed. Cir. 2016), leaving intact the panel’s decision affirming two...more
6/23/2016
/ Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) ,
BPCIA ,
Commercial Marketing ,
Corporate Counsel ,
Forum Selection ,
Generic Drugs ,
Manufacturers ,
Mylan Pharmaceuticals ,
Out-of-State Companies ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent Validity ,
Patents ,
Personal Jurisdiction
Under 35 U.S.C. § 271(e), filing an Abbreviated Biologics License Application (aBLA)—like filing an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA)— can be an act of patent infringement resulting in ‘artificial’ injury to a patentee....more
10/5/2015
/ Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) ,
aBLA ,
Biologics ,
BPCIA ,
Consent ,
DaimlerAG ,
DaimlerChrysler v Bauman ,
General Jurisdiction ,
Interlocutory Appeals ,
Motion to Dismiss ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patents ,
Personal Jurisdiction ,
Pharmaceutical Industry ,
SCOTUS ,
Specific Jurisdiction
In its January 2015 decision, Teva Pharms. USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc., the Supreme Court held that the ultimate construction of a patent claim term is a question of law, subject to de novo appellate review, but that the...more
An emerging issue in Hatch-Waxman litigation – and potentially under the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA) – is the impact of the Supreme Court’s decision in Daimler AG v. Bauman, 134 S. Ct.746 (2014), on...more