FOX FACTORY, INC. v. SRAM, LLC -
Before Prost, Wallach, and Hughes. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB).
Summary: When a commercial product contains unclaimed features, a presumption of nexus between...more
BIODELIVERY SCIENCES INTL. v. AQUESTIVE THERAPEUTICS, INC.
Before Newman, Lourie, and Reyna. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB).
Summary: The PTAB has the discretion to not institute inter partes...more
9/11/2019
/ Appeals ,
Final Written Decisions ,
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding ,
Likelihood of Success ,
Motion to Dismiss ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Patents ,
Remand ,
SAS Institute Inc. v Iancu ,
USPTO
GAME AND TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. v. ACTIVISION BLIZZARD INC.
Before Prost, Lourie, and Wallach. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB).
Summary: A single prior art reference can render a patent obvious if it...more
Federal Circuit Summary -
Before Lourie, O’Malley, and Chen. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: When the ranges identified in a claimed composition overlap with the ranges disclosed in the prior...more
Federal Circuit Summaries -
Before Prost, Newman, and Wallach. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: An unsupported expert opinion does not constitute substantial evidence to contradict a prior art...more
6/1/2018
/ Anticipatory Reference ,
Appeals ,
Expert Testimony ,
Final Written Decisions ,
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Prior Art ,
Remand ,
Reversal ,
Substantial Evidence Standard ,
Vacated
Federal Circuit Summaries -
Before Moore, Wallach, and Stoll. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: The PTAB is entitled to weigh the credibility of expert witnesses, and attorney argument cannot be...more
A magistrate judge in the Eastern District of Texas recommended in Network-1 Technologies, Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc. Case No. 6:11-cv-492 (E.D.Tex. September 25, 2017) that Hewlett-Packard (“HP”) should be estopped...more
A magistrate judge in the Eastern District of Texas recommended in Biscotti, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., No. 2:13-CV-01015, DI 191 (E.D. Tex. May 11, 2017) that Microsoft should be estopped from asserting invalidity grounds that...more
5/19/2017
/ Concurrent Litigation ,
Estoppel ,
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding ,
Microsoft ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Invalidity ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Patents ,
Prior Art ,
Stays
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board issued concurrent final written decisions upholding the validity of all challenged claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,141,154 in Palo Alto Networks, Inc. v. Finjan. Inc. IPR2015-01979, Paper 62...more