Last week, a unanimous Supreme Court ruled that plaintiffs asserting Lanham Act claims can recover an infringer’s or false advertiser’s profits without proving that the defendant acted willfully. The opinion, authored by...more
4/27/2020
/ § 1125(a) ,
§ 1125(c) ,
Appeals ,
Burden of Proof ,
Charge-Filing Preconditions ,
Compensatory Awards ,
Dilution ,
Lanham Act ,
Lost Profits ,
Remand ,
Remedies ,
Romag Fasteners v Fossil ,
SCOTUS ,
Trademark Infringement ,
Trademark Litigation ,
Trademarks ,
Vacated ,
Willful Infringement
Lanham Act False Advertising -
Lanham Act Liability for Native Advertising Violations -
Casper Sleep, Inc. v. Mitcham, --- F. Supp. 3d ---, No. 16 Civ. 3224 (JSR), 2016 WL 4574388 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 1, 2016)...more
2/2/2017
/ Advertising ,
All Natural ,
Article III ,
Campbell Ewald v Gomez ,
Class Action ,
Consumer Fraud ,
Data Privacy ,
Data Security ,
Enforcement Actions ,
False Advertising ,
Injunctive Relief ,
Jurisdiction ,
Lanham Act ,
Misleading Impressions ,
Mootness ,
NAD ,
NARB ,
Native Advertising ,
Nutrition Facts Labels ,
Offer of Judgment ,
Online Reviews ,
Product Labels ,
Puffery ,
Rule 68 ,
SCOTUS ,
Slack-Fill Suits ,
Spokeo v Robins ,
Standing