Latest Posts › Mental Health

Share:

The LHD/ERISA Advisor – June 2021: Sparsely Pleaded Parity Act Lawsuit Survives Motion to Dismiss

In Nathan W. v. Anthem Bluecross Blueshield of Wisconsin, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42127 (M (D. Utah Mar. 5, 2021), a federal court held that conclusory allegations of discriminatory medical necessity criteria were sufficient to...more

The LHD/ERISA Advisor – June 2021: Health Plan May Not Exclude Specific Autism Treatments

The extent to which a health plan may exclude coverage for mental health treatment modalities has become an active area in ERISA litigation. In Doe v. United Behavioral Health, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43146 (N.D. Cal. March 5,...more

The LHD/ERISA Advisor – June 2021

Hinshaw's LHD/ERISA Advisor remains committed to bringing you recent legal developments that may guide your life, health, and disability litigation strategy and claims decisions....more

Court Affirms Principle that Challenges to Benefits Determination Involving Mental Illness Limitation Require Specific, Concrete...

In Gill v. Unum Life Ins. Co. of Am., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 219416 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2020), a California federal court held that an ERISA claim administrator properly limited benefits to 24 months under the plan's mental...more

Denial of Mental Health Treatment Benefits Ruled Improper under Milliman Care Guidelines

In Jessica U. v. Health Care Service Corp., a Montana district court held that an ERISA plan administrator improperly denied benefits for mental health residential treatment based solely on so-called "Milliman Care...more

The LHD/ERISA Advisor - October 2020: Utah Court Rules ERISA Plan Was Wrong to Deny Coverage for Mental Health Care Received at...

In Raymond M. v. Beacon Health Options, Inc., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94615 (D. Utah, May 29, 2020), a Utah district court held that an ERISA plan improperly applied acute-level criteria when denying benefits for a...more

The LHD/ERISA Advisor - October 2020: Tenth Circuit Finds District Court Applied Wrong Standard of Review in Evaluating Plan...

In Lyn M. v. Premera Blue Cross, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 23395 (10th Cir. July 24, 2020), the Tenth Circuit held that a district court had applied the wrong standard of review and incorrectly evaluated an ERISA plan...more

The LHD/ERISA Advisor: New York Court Rejects Claim that Health Insurer Violated the Parity Act

In Julie L. v. Excellus Health Plan, Inc., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47734 (W.D.N.Y. March 19, 2020), a New York district court rejected the plaintiff's claims that a health insurer improperly imposed stricter medical necessity...more

8 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide