A U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland recently denied summary judgment in a case under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), finding that the defendant failed to show it received prior express written...more
In March, a district court in the Eastern District of California followed other courts holding that an undated, model form debt validation notice does not violate the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). Specifically,...more
In Perrong v. Chase Data Corp., et al., a court in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania recently ruled that no personal liability attaches to the owner of a company for Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) violations....more
A U.S. District Court in the Southern District of California recently held that a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68 offer of judgment must clearly state that attorneys’ fees and costs are limited or waived, as Arvest Central...more
12/7/2023
/ Attorney's Fees ,
CA Supreme Court ,
Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act (CCRAA) ,
Consumer Litigation ,
Credit Reports ,
Damages ,
Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) ,
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ,
Financial Services Industry ,
Forbearance Agreements ,
Mortgages ,
Offer of Judgment ,
Rule 68 ,
Statutory Violations
Last week, a district court in Nevada held that an undated, model form debt validation notice does not violate the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). In Bergida v. PlusFour, Inc., the defendant sent a debt validation...more
11/9/2023
/ Consumer Financial Products ,
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) ,
Debt Buyers ,
Debt Collection ,
Debt Collectors ,
FDCPA ,
Financial Services Industry ,
Motion to Dismiss ,
Regulation F ,
Safe Harbors ,
Statutory Violations