Latest Publications

Share:

FINRA Grants Respondents’ Motions for Sanctions Against Claimant and Broker’s Request for Expungement

Marlin Keith Andrews v. William S. Humber and Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., FINRA Case #22-01176 - The claimant asserted causes of action including failure to supervise, breach of fiduciary duty, respondeat superior,...more

FINRA Encouraged to Take Remedial Action to Correct Broker’s CRD Record

Aramis Seferian v. Continental Broker-Dealer Corp., FINRA Case #23-00665 - The claimant broker requested expungement of two customer complaints from his CRD record. In an explained decision, the FINRA Panel denied the...more

Court Affirms Validity of Finra’s Six-Year Eligibility Rule

Strickland v. Calton & Associates, FINRA Case #22-02233 - The claimant asserted causes of action, including breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, violation of the Arizona Consumer Fraud Act, and negligent misrepresentation...more

Arbitrator Finds No Extraordinary Circumstances Existed That Would Permit the Equitable Tolling of FINRA’s Six-Year Eligibility...

In an action filed in 2022 involving allegations of breach of fiduciary duty, negligence and fraud related to certain unspecified securities, an arbitrator granted the respondent broker-dealer’s motion to dismiss pursuant to...more

Broker-Dealer Found Grossly Negligent for Employees’ Ponzi Scheme Operated Out of Its Offices

A group of investors alleged causes of action, including breach of fiduciary duty and respondeat superior, against the broker-dealer for its failure to supervise four of its employees who operated a Ponzi scheme out of the...more

5 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide