Latest Posts › Patent Litigation

Share:

IPR Proceedings Were Not Prohibited by a Forum Selection Clause in a Non-disclosure Agreement

KANNUU PTY LTD. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. Before Newman, Prost, and Chen. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Summary: The forum selection clause in the parties'...more

Federal Circuit Lacks Jurisdiction Over Standalone Antitrust Claim Concerning An Unenforceable Patent

CHANDLER v. PHOENIX SERVICES LLC - Before Chen, Wallach, and Hughes. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Summary: The Federal Circuit lacks subject matter jurisdiction...more

No Patent Eligibility Reward for Customer Loyalty Program Computer System

CXLOYALTY, INC. v. MARITZ HOLDINGS INC. Before Prost, Lourie, and Hughes. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: A claim implementing an abstract idea using conventional techniques is patent...more

An Old Method Using an Old Product From a New Source Is Not New

BIOGEN MA INC. v. EMD SERONO, INC. Before Newman, Linn, and Hughes. Appeal from the District Court of the District of New Jersey. Summary: A known method of administering a known product made by a new process is not...more

Competing Evidence Regarding Whether Reference Qualifies as Primary Reference Precludes Summary Judgment of Obviousness of a...

SPIGEN KOREA CO., LTD. v. ULTRAPROOF, INC. Before Newman, Lourie, and Reyna. Appeal from the Central District of California. Summary: Summary judgment of obviousness is improper for a design patent if there is a genuine...more

PTAB Cannot Institute IPR on PTAB-Created Grounds

KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. v. GOOGLE LLC - Before Prost, Newman, and Moore. Appeal from Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: The Board can institute IPR only on grounds raised in a petition. Additionally, the Board...more

An Improper Reply to a Final Office Action May Result in the Accrual of Applicant Delay for PTA Calculations

INTRA-CELLULAR THERAPIES, INC v. IANCU - Before Wallach, Chen, and Hughes.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Summary:  If a proper reply to a final Office Action is not...more

Prior Art Must Be Publicly Accessible, Not Actually Accessed

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. v. INFOBRIDGE PTE. LTD. Before Newman, Schall, and O’Malley. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: A reference must be publicly accessible, not actually accessed, before...more

Finding No Unambiguous Definition in Record, Federal Circuit Applies Plain Meaning to Disputed PTAB Construction

BRADIUM TECHNOLOGIES LLC V. ANDREI IANCU - Before Moore, Reyna, and Chen. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: A clear and unambiguous definition of a claim term is required to redefine the term to...more

In Re: Marco Guldenaar Holdings B.V.

Federal Circuit Summaries - Before Chen, Mayer, and Bryson. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Claims directed to the abstract idea of rules for playing a dice game are not transformed into patent...more

10 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide