Thomas Kaufman

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

+ Follow Contact

Latest Posts › Corporate Counsel

Share:

Intervening Authority: California Supreme Court Curbs the Authority of PAGA Litigants to Intervene in Overlapping PAGA Actions

On August 1, 2024, the California Supreme Court issued a decision in Turrieta v. Lyft that substantially narrows the authority of PAGA litigants to intervene in overlapping PAGA actions. The Supreme Court’s ruling confirms...more

8/12/2024 / California , Corporate Counsel , Employer Liability Issues , Employment Litigation , Governor Newsom , Labor Law Violations , Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) , Regulatory Agenda , State Labor Laws , Wage and Hour

Manageability – a New Weapon to Stave Off Unmanageable PAGA Claims

On September 9, 2021, California’s Court of Appeal issued an important decision in Wesson v. Staples The Office Superstore, LLC (“Wesson”), holding that trial courts have discretion to strike claims brought under the Private...more

9/15/2021 / Appeals , CA Supreme Court , Class Action , Class Certification , Corporate Counsel , Employer Liability Issues , Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) , Rest and Meal Break , Wage and Hour

California Appellate Court Clarifies the Monetary Amount for Meal Period, Rest Break, and Recovery Period Premiums, and Affirms an...

On October 9, 2019, the Second Appellate District of the California Court of Appeal issued a decision clarifying the rate of pay at which an employer must pay meal period, rest break, and recovery period premiums. More...more

11/5/2019 / Best Practices , Corporate Counsel , Employer Liability Issues , Labor Code , Rate of Pay , Rest and Meal Break , Rounding , Wage and Hour

3 Results

View per page

Page: of 1