In a heavy blow to the litigation funding industry, the UK Supreme Court has held that many litigation funding agreements are damages-based agreements and must comply with the relevant regulatory regime. Funders will be...more
A challenge to a Court judgment on grounds of fraud brings into conflict two fundamental principles of English law: (i) the finality of judgments; and (ii) the principle that fraud unravels all. Given the importance of the...more
The Court of Appeal has confirmed in Bank St Petersburg PJSC v Vitaly Arkhangelsky that the correct standard of proof where issues of dishonesty arise is not a ‘heightened’ civil standard, but the balance of probabilities....more
4/2/2020
/ Appeals ,
Burden of Proof ,
Complex Litigation ,
Counterclaims ,
Evidentiary Rulings ,
Evidentiary Standards ,
Fraud ,
Pleading Standards ,
Remand ,
Reversal ,
Standard of Review ,
UK
National Bank Trust v Ilya Yurov & Ors [2020] EWHC 100 (Comm) provides a useful insight to the English Court's approach to pleading and evidencing fraud, emphasising the importance of properly particularised claims and...more
3/5/2020
/ Admissible Evidence ,
Banks ,
Breach of Duty ,
Bribery ,
Burden of Proof ,
Circumstantial Evidence ,
Civil Conspiracy ,
Cross Examination ,
Document Productions ,
Fraud ,
Litigation Strategies ,
Pleading Standards ,
Pleadings ,
Ponzi Scheme ,
Shareholders ,
Standard of Proof ,
UK ,
Witness Statements
In Vneshprombank LLC v Georgy Bedzhamov and ors [2019] EWCA Civ 1992 the Court of Appeal reaffirmed the approach to ascertaining the "ordinary living expenses" of a respondent to a freezing injunction....more
In Rogachev v Goryainov [2019] EWHC 1529 (QB) the High Court discharged a freezing injunction for non-disclosure at the return date hearing and refused to grant further injunctive relief highlighting the significance of full...more