In response to the rapidly developing COVID-19 pandemic, North Carolina Governor Roy Cooper issued an order on March 27, 2020 requiring all people in the state to stay in their homes “except as permitted in” the order. In a...more
The Third Circuit has recently held in In re Denby-Peterson, 941 F.3d 115 (3rd Cir. 2019) that creditors who refuse to relinquish an item that was seized pre-petition are not subject to sanctions because their refusal does...more
2/3/2020
/ Affirmative Defenses ,
Asset Seizure ,
Automatic Stay ,
Bankruptcy Court ,
Certiorari ,
Collateral ,
Creditors ,
Debtors ,
Repossess ,
Section 362 ,
Turnover Laws ,
Willful Violations
The FDCPA requires that any lawsuit must be brought, if at all, “within one year from the date on which the violation” of the act occurs. 15 U.S.C. § 1692k(d). The US Supreme Court will hear argument this month in Rotkiske v....more
10/4/2019
/ Appeals ,
Cause of Action Accrual ,
Certiorari ,
Debt Collection ,
Default Judgment ,
Discovery Rule ,
FDCPA ,
Rotkiske v. Klemm ,
SCOTUS ,
Split of Authority ,
Statute of Limitations ,
Time-Barred Claims ,
Tolling
A debt collection agency did not violate § 1692g(b)’s 30-day validation period by sending two letters demanding payment and offering settlement terms during that period, a district court in Illinois has ruled. In Moreno v....more
Attempting to collect on time-barred debt without informing the consumer that a payment may renew the applicable statute of limitations creates an “informational injury” sufficient to confer Article III standing, a district...more
A single missed call from a telemarketer constitutes a concrete injury that gives rise to standing, a federal district court in California has ruled. In Shuckett v. DialAmerica Marketing, Inc., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29598...more
3/18/2019
/ Article III ,
Injury-in-Fact ,
Invasion of Privacy ,
Prior Express Consent ,
Robocalling ,
Spokeo v Robins ,
Standing ,
TCPA ,
Telecommunications ,
Telemarketing ,
Text Messages
A single missed call from a telemarketer constitutes a concrete injury that gives rise to standing, a federal district court in California has ruled. In Shuckett v. DialAmerica Marketing, Inc., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29598...more
Text messages from a gym to its member were informational in nature and therefore did not violate the TCPA, a district court in Louisiana ruled late last month. The case, Suriano v. French Riviera Health, Spa, Inc., 2018 U.S....more
District Court Takes Expansive View of Deceptive or Misleading Practices under FDCPA -
The FDCPA prohibits a debt collector from using "any false, deceptive, or misleading representation" in connection with the collection...more
5/11/2018
/ Administrative Appointments ,
Article III ,
ATDS ,
Collection Agencies ,
Consumer Financial Products ,
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) ,
Credit Reports ,
Debt Collection ,
Disclosure Requirements ,
FCC ,
FDCPA ,
Fees ,
Financial Services Industry ,
Foreclosure ,
Interest Accrual ,
Proposed Legislation ,
Safe Harbors ,
Strategic Enforcement Plan ,
TCPA ,
Unfair or Deceptive Trade Practices
In ACA International v. Federal Communications Commission, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 6535 (2018), the DC Circuit rejected a series of challenges to the FCC’s 2015 Declaratory Ruling brought by Rite-Aid related to the...more
4/4/2018
/ Declaratory Rulings ,
FCC ,
Health Care Providers ,
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) ,
Healthcare ,
Pharmacies ,
Prior Express Consent ,
Right to Privacy ,
Rite Aid ,
Robocalling ,
TCPA ,
Telemarketing
A District Court in the Seventh Circuit has held that a debt collector may not avail itself of the § 1692k(c) bona fide error defense if it “intentionally chose to present conflicting information,” even if that conflicting...more
The United States House of Representatives passed H.R. 3299, commonly known as the “Madden fix” bill, by a vote of 245-171 on February 14, 2018. The bill, which is officially entitled “Protecting Consumers’ Access to Credit...more
Eighteen years ago, the Seventh Circuit crafted “safe harbor” language which, if used, shielded debt collectors from liability under 15 U.S.C. § 1692g. A recent decision, Boucher v. Fin. Sys. of Green Bay, 2018 U.S. App....more
The FDCPA prohibits a debt collector from using “any false, deceptive, or misleading representation” in connection with the collection of a debt. See 15 U.S.C. § 1692e. Recently, the Eastern District of New York took an...more
The Senate voted on Tuesday, October 24, to repeal the CFPB’s Arbitration Rule first proposed in May of 2016 and issued in its final form in July. The rule would have imposed limitations on the use of pre-dispute arbitration...more
10/26/2017
/ Arbitration ,
Arbitration Agreements ,
Banking Sector ,
Class Action ,
Class Action Arbitration Waivers ,
Congressional Review Act ,
Consumer Contracts ,
Consumer Financial Products ,
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) ,
Consumer Lenders ,
Dodd-Frank ,
Federal Arbitration Act ,
Financial Services Industry
An unpublished opinion from the Sixth Circuit provides a useful application of the statute of limitations to bar a debtor’s claims under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1691e (“ECOA”). In Guy v. Mercantile Bank...more