5 Key Takeaways - A New Era Dawns for Design Patent Validity - How the Federal Circuit Has Rewritten Design Patent Obviousness Law

Kilpatrick
Contact

Kilpatrick partners Megan Bussey, Nicki Kennedy, and Michael Bertelson recently presented at the 20th annual KTIPS (Kilpatrick Townsend Intellectual Property Seminar) on the topic of “A New Era Dawns for Design Patent Validity - How the Federal Circuit Has Rewritten Design Patent Obviousness Law.” The panel discussed U.S. design patents and how they have historically been very difficult to invalidate. For decades, the Rosen-Durling test has been used to assess obviousness of U.S. design patents. The test’s rigid standard resulted in few design patents being invalidated as obvious. The Federal Circuit’s May 2024 en banc decision in LKQ Corporation v. GM Global Technology Operations LLC overruled the Rosen-Durling test, paving the way for a more flexible approach to demonstrating design patent obviousness. This shift will impact how patent owners and patent challengers approach U.S. design patents in the future.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Kilpatrick

Written by:

Kilpatrick
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Kilpatrick on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide