A Cumulous Cloud Of Confusion Reigns Over Vote Required For Say-On-Pay Frequency

Allen Matkins
Contact

In reviewing recent proxy statement filings with the Securites and Exchange Commission, I’ve noted a great deal of confusion regarding the vote required for approval of the newly mandated advisory resolution on the frequency of shareholder votes on executive compensation. Section 951 of the Dodd-Frank Act requires issuers to include in their proxy statements a resolution to determine whether the shareholder advisory vote on executive compensation will occur “every 1, 2, or 3 years”. The SEC in its new Rule 14a-4(b)(3) has added the requirement that the proxy card allow a stockholder the option of marking “abstain”.

Because the proxy must offer a choice among several alternatives, some companies are stating in their proxy statements that the option that achieves a plurality vote will be determined to be the decision of the shareholders. For example, one company’s proxy statement states...

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Allen Matkins | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Allen Matkins
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Allen Matkins on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide