As we approach the end of the first quarter of 2025, estate planners and their clients are closely monitoring developments in Washington, D.C. The scheduled sunset of the increased estate and gift tax exemption is now less than a year away, and the window for proactive planning under the current exemption is rapidly narrowing.
Where Things Stand: The House’s Budget Resolution
As the first step in the budget reconciliation process, the House passed a budget resolution in February, setting the stage for $4.5 trillion in tax cuts over the next decade—potentially including an extension of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act’s (TCJA) estate and gift tax provisions. However, for the reconciliation process to move forward, the Senate must pass an identical resolution—an outcome that remains uncertain given ongoing fiscal policy disagreements.
What is Budget Reconciliation Anyway?
The budget reconciliation process is a legislative tool that allows Congress to pass certain tax and spending measures with a simple majority in the Senate—bypassing the 60-vote filibuster threshold. Reconciliation is designed to expedite budget-related legislation by imposing strict procedural limits on debate and amendments.
The process follows several key steps:
1. Budget Resolution Passage – The House and Senate must first pass an identical budget resolution, which sets revenue and spending targets and includes “reconciliation instructions,” directing specific committees to draft legislation modifying tax and spending policies. The budget resolution itself is not subject to presidential approval.
2. Committee Drafting – Once the resolution passes both chambers of Congress, the House Ways and Means Committee and the Senate Finance Committee—each responsible for overseeing tax policy in its respective chamber—must draft tax-related legislation that aligns revenue and spending with the resolution. This includes any proposed extension of the estate and gift tax exemption.
3. Bill Compilation and Debate – The respective committees’ proposals are consolidated into a single reconciliation bill. In the Senate, debate on this bill is limited to 20 hours, preventing a filibuster.
4. Final Passage and Presidential Approval – Both chambers must pass an identical reconciliation bill, which is then sent to the president for signature or veto.
While reconciliation offers a viable path for extending the estate tax exemption, the process comes with significant constraints. The “Byrd Rule,” for example, prohibits provisions that do not have a direct budgetary impact or that increase the federal deficit beyond a 10-year window. This means that even if an extension is included in a reconciliation bill, it could be subject to sunset provisions or other limitations.
Senate Opposition Blocks House Budget Resolution’s Path Forward
Despite the House’s passage of a budget resolution in February, the chances of it surviving the Senate in its current form are slim to none. Senate Republicans, while broadly supportive of tax cuts, have signaled skepticism toward the House’s sweeping $4.5 trillion tax package. Instead, Senate leadership has advocated for a more targeted, incremental approach—one that prioritizes military, border security, and energy policy before turning to tax matters.
Adding to the challenge, Senate Republicans remain divided on the scope of any tax package, with fiscal hawks expressing concerns about deficit implications and the sustainability of further tax reductions. The House’s resolution includes deep tax cuts while simultaneously increasing the debt ceiling, a combination that some Senate conservatives view as fiscally irresponsible. Without changes that address these concerns, the resolution is unlikely to gain traction in the upper chamber.
Even if Senate Republicans were to coalesce around a modified version of the resolution, however, procedural realities make reconciliation a difficult path. The Senate must pass an identical resolution to the House’s for the process to proceed. Given the ideological divide between the two chambers, any Senate amendments or revisions would require the House to either accept a scaled-back version or risk deadlock. And, at this stage, there is little indication that House leadership is willing to compromise on its ambitious tax agenda.
Why Now is the Time to Prepare
While the House’s budget resolution provides a potential pathway for extending the current estate and gift tax exemptions, Senate opposition makes its passage far from certain. Given the political and procedural hurdles ahead, estate planners should take a cautious approach and begin preparing clients for the possibility that the exemption could revert to pre-2018 levels in 2026. The best course of action is to remain flexible, reviewing existing estate plans now and setting the groundwork for strategic moves that can be implemented if legislative uncertainty persists.
Key Steps to Consider Now
Rather than waiting for Congress to act—or fail to act—estate planners should work with clients to evaluate their options and position themselves to act at the appropriate time. Some of the most effective strategies include:
- Reviewing Estate Plans for Potential Exposure – With the possibility of the exemption dropping from approximately $14 million per individual in 2025 to around $7 million in 2026, clients with substantial estates should reassess their plans to determine whether they may face estate tax liability if the exemption is reduced.
- Structuring Gifts to Utilize the Current Exemption – The IRS has confirmed that gifts made under the current exemption will not be subject to clawback if the exemption later decreases. High-net-worth individuals may want to consider lifetime gifting strategies, including outright transfers or gifts to trusts.
- Utilizing Irrevocable Trusts – Options such as Spousal Lifetime Access Trusts (SLATs), Grantor Retained Annuity Trusts (GRATs), and Dynasty Trusts can help remove assets from a taxable estate while preserving access, control, or multigenerational benefits.
- Incorporating Charitable Giving into the Estate Plan – Charitable remainder trusts (CRTs) and direct charitable donations can reduce taxable estates while achieving philanthropic goals.
Timing Matters: Preparing for Preventative Action
Because some estate planning strategies take time to implement—especially those involving trust structures, valuation of business interests, or complex gifting arrangements—clients should not wait until the end of 2025 to begin their planning. Instead, estate planners should help clients put contingency plans in place now, ensuring that necessary steps can be executed at the right time should legislative uncertainty continue.
For many, the best approach will be a measured, staged implementation, allowing flexibility in case Congress does act to extend the higher exemption. However, given the unpredictability of the legislative process, proactive planning now will provide the greatest ability to mitigate potential tax exposure later.
Conclusion
Estate planners and their clients should recognize that while Washington debates the future of the estate tax, the clock is ticking. Reviewing existing plans, identifying areas of risk, and preparing to take action if necessary will ensure that clients remain in the best possible position—regardless of what happens in Congress.
[View source.]
