Another Morrison-Related Decision

Mayer Brown Free Writings + Perspectives
Contact

Mayer Brown Free Writings + Perspectives

In a recent case, the Second Circuit court decided that a Securities Exchange Act Section 10(b) action could be brought because the transaction at issue had sufficient connections to the United States to constitute a “domestic transaction.”   The action involved Bahamian and American plaintiffs bringing an action against a Bahamian company.  The company’s securities were not listed in the United States.  The Supreme Court standard established in the Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd. case held that Section 10(b) applies only to “transactions listed on domestic exchanges and domestic transactions in other securities.”  The Second Circuit based its conclusion on the fact that the plaintiffs became obligated to take and pay for the securities, and the securities were delivered in the United States.  Even though Bahamian regulatory approval was required for the issuance, the condition subsequent did not negate the fact that liability had been incurred in the United States.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Mayer Brown Free Writings + Perspectives | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Mayer Brown Free Writings + Perspectives
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Mayer Brown Free Writings + Perspectives on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide