Antitrust Lawsuits Accuse Insurers of Conspiring to Deny Fire Insurance to California Homeowners

Paul Hastings LLP
Contact

Paul Hastings LLP

On April 18, 2025, law firms representing California homeowners filed a pair of lawsuits accusing dozens of insurance companies of conspiring to deny property insurance to homeowners in fire-prone areas of California, including neighborhoods affected by the January fires in Los Angeles County. The complaints assert that the insurers’ alleged conspiracy violates California’s antitrust statute and the California Unfair Competition Law.

The plaintiff homeowners filed the two lawsuits in Los Angeles County Superior Court. The first case, Ferrier v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., is asserted solely on behalf of individual plaintiffs. In the second case, Canzoneri v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., the named plaintiff seeks to represent a putative class of California homeowners. The plaintiffs each seek treble damages, an injunction and other relief.

The two complaints broadly allege that the defendant insurers, which are licensed by the California Department of Insurance, implemented a “scheme” beginning in mid-2023 to terminate existing fire insurance policies and cease offering new policies in certain California geographies, including Pacific Palisades and Altadena. According to the plaintiffs, the defendants’ purpose was to force homeowners in these areas to buy higher-priced and lower-quality policies from the California FAIR Plan.

Pursuant to statute, the FAIR Plan obligates personal property insurers, including the defendants, to apportion among themselves the responsibility for providing basic property insurance for “otherwise uninsurable” Californians. The complaints claim that policies offered by the FAIR Plan cover much less than standard insurance policies do, but carry higher premiums. And so, because insurers share the FAIR Plan’s profits and losses, the alleged conspiracy supposedly allowed the insurers to increase their revenues from premiums while limiting their liability exposure.

The plaintiffs allege that the defendant insurers reached and maintained their unlawful agreement through regular communications and information exchanges with one another, including through the FAIR Plan and trade associations.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Paul Hastings LLP

Written by:

Paul Hastings LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Paul Hastings LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide