Board’s Decision Revises Joint-Employer Status Test

Robinson & Cole LLP
Contact

On August 27, 2015, the National Labor Relations Board (Board) issued a split decision (3-2) that drastically changes the test for determining whether an entity is considered a “joint employer” for purposes of collective bargaining. Browning-Ferris Industries of California Inc., 362 NLRB No. 186.

Overturning prior precedent, the Board held that Browning-Ferris Industries (BFI) was a joint employer of cleaning, sorting, and housekeeping workers at its California facility, even though a subcontractor, Leadpoint, hired and supervised those employees. In doing so, the Board revised the test for determining whether a company is a “joint employer.” It set forth a new, two-part test that examines (1) whether a common law employment relationship exists with the employees at issue and (2) whether the putative joint employer possesses sufficient control over the employees’ essential terms and conditions of employment to permit meaningful collective bargaining.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Robinson & Cole LLP

Written by:

Robinson & Cole LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Robinson & Cole LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide