California’s Supreme Court Makes It Harder For Employees to Recover Penalties In Wage Statement Claims

Amundsen Davis LLC
Contact

Amundsen Davis LLC

On May 6, 2024, California’s Supreme Court, in a rare and surprising “employer friendly” decision, held that an employer can avoid penalties under California’s wage statement law, Cal. Lab. Code § 226, if it reasonably and in good faith believed it was providing a complete and accurate wage statement in compliance with the requirements of Cal. Lab. Code § 226(a).

Under Cal. Lab. Code § 226(e)(1), employees can recover the following penalties for an employer’s “knowing and intentional” failure to provide accurate wage statements:

the greater of all actual damages or fifty dollars ($50) for the initial pay period in which a violation occurs and one hundred dollars ($100) per employee for each violation in a subsequent pay period, not to exceed an aggregate penalty of four thousand dollars ($4,000), and is entitled to an award of costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees.

Employee claims for unpaid wages in California almost always include a derivative claim that the employer failed to provide them with an accurate wage statement in violation of Cal. Lab. Code § 226(a). Under Cal. Lab. Code § 203, employees can recover penalties if their employer “willfully” fails to pay them wages when they are discharged or quit. But, California’s lower courts, and federal courts, have been divided on the issue of whether an employer's good faith belief that it provided complete and accurate wage statements prevents employees from recovering penalties under Cal. Lab. Code § 226(e)(1) for an employer’s “knowing and intentional” failure to report the same unpaid wages, or any other required information, on a wage statement.

On Monday, California’s Supreme Court settled the issue once and for all in the case of Naranjo v. Spectrum Sec. Servs., Inc., by holding that an employer's good faith belief that it provided complete and accurate wage statements bars employees from recovering penalties under Cal. Lab. Code § 226(e)(1).

This is big news for California employers because it (i) provides them with an affirmative defense they can raise against an employee’s claim that they “knowingly and intentionally” failed to provide accurate wage statements; and (ii) makes it harder for employees to recover penalties on such claims which are oftentimes more than the total amount of unpaid wages claimed.

Of course, California employers must still ensure they comply with the requirements of California’s wage statement law and provide accurate wage statements to their employees.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Amundsen Davis LLC | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Amundsen Davis LLC
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Amundsen Davis LLC on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide