CFPB Rescinds Special Regulatory Treatment for EWA Company

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
Contact

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

On June 30, the CFPB issued an order terminating an EWA provider’s Sandbox Approval Order relating to its earned wage access products. In December 2020, the CFPB provided the company special regulatory treatment, including a temporary safe harbor from liability under TILA/Reg. Z because, in part, the EWA program did not involve the offering or extension of “credit” as defined by Reg. Z. In its press release, the CFPB note that the “temporary safe harbor is for offering and providing certain earned wage access products, subject to good faith compliance with the terms of the approval order.”

According to the Bureau, the CFPB informed the company on June 3, 2022, that it was considering terminating the approval order in light of certain public statements the company made wrongly suggesting a CFPB endorsement of its products. On June 21, 2022, the company notified the CFPB that it was planning to modify its earned wage access product fee model. The CFPB notes that the 2020 approval order only applies to the company’s existing products and any changes to the product fee model would require modification to the order. The company instead requested termination of the order so it could make fee model changes quickly and flexibly.

Putting It Into Practice: In its announcement, the CFPB states that it has received requests for clarification regarding its November 2020 advisory opinion on EWA products. In January 22, the CFPB General Counsel indicated that more clarity on EWA products was needed from the CFPB in response to consumer groups arguing that the opinion was being misused as justification for illegal EWA products (we discussed this in a previous blog post here). The CFPB plans to issue further guidance soon to provide greater clarity concerning the application of the definition of “credit” under TILA/Reg. Z. In light of these developments, it is possible that the CFPB will revise or rescind the 2020 Advisory Opinion, and, as such, EWA providers should prepare for greater regulatory scrutiny.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide