CFPB withdraws its proposed rule to ban nonsufficient fees

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Contact

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

On January 14, the CFPB withdrew its proposed rule prohibiting financial institutions from charging nonsufficient funds (NSF) fees on transactions that are “instantaneously or near-instantaneously” declined. NSF fees are charged when consumers attempt transactions that exceed their available account funds.

As previously covered by InfoBytes, the CFPB’s original proposed rule would have prohibited financial institutions from charging certain NSF fees by identifying them as an “abusive” act or practice. Nearly 8,000 comments, from both supporters and detractors, influenced the decision to withdraw the rule, with many highlighting that other NSF fees, such as those for recurring ACH transactions, could also be abusive. The CFPB acknowledged that practices involving NSF fees on other transactions might also be deemed “abusive” but noted these fees were outside the original proposal’s scope. Accordingly, the CFPB withdrew the rulemaking to “determine whether a broader rulemaking would be appropriate.”

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

Written by:

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide