Challenges to Gig Worker Laws Are Spreading

Amundsen Davis LLC
Contact

Amundsen Davis LLC

Several States and major U.S. Cities, including California, New York City and Seattle, have passed laws aimed at  classifying “gig workers” as employees as opposed to independent contractors in recent years.  Challenges to these laws are spreading, but finding no sympathy with courts thus far.

Gig workers are individuals who perform temporary, freelance or contract work, like drivers and delivery drivers, and who are usually classified as independent contractors by the businesses who utilize their services. Independent contractors typically are not subject to the same laws as employees, including those mandating benefits such as paid time off, minimum wage or overtime pay. 

On June 10, 2024 the United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit upheld California’s Assembly Bill 5 (AB 5), which requires employers to classify certain individuals as employees rather than independent contractors unless certain conditions are satisfied. 

AB 5, which took effect on January 1, 2020, requires employers to treat individuals as employees unless:

(A) The person is free from the control and direction of the hiring entity in connection with the performance of the work, both under the contract for the performance of the work and in fact;

(B) The person performs work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business; and

(C) The person is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business of the same nature as that involved in the work performed.

This is commonly referred to as the “ABC” test.  The plaintiffs  challenged AB 5, arguing California’s Legislature unlawfully targeted app-based businesses. The 9th Circuit disagreed and upheld AB 5, reasoning  that California’s Legislature rationally believed app-based businesses impermissibly misclassify gig workers to avoid the financial responsibilities associated with employing them, which deprives these workers of benefits and the state of California of needed revenue from mandatory employee deductions. 

Notably, however, a 2020 voter-approved ballot measure, Proposition 22, excludes gig workers from AB 5. Proposition 22 is currently being challenged before California’s Supreme Court.

App-based businesses lost a similar effort in 2023 to block New York City’s minimum wage rules from going into effect, which required companies to pay gig workers a minimum wage of $17.96 per hour when the rules took effect, and gradually increases to $19.96 an hour when the rule is fully phased in on April 1, 2025.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Amundsen Davis LLC | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Amundsen Davis LLC
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Amundsen Davis LLC on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide