Claim Construction Issues In ANDA Case.

Morris James LLP
Contact

Abbvie Inc., et al. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al., C.A. No. 13-1072 – RGA, June 3, 2015

Andrews, J. Claim construction opinion regarding x disputed terms from 6 patents. Oral argument took place on May 22, 2015.

The disputed product relates to ritanovir.  The disputed claims construed are:

  1. Formulated as a solid dispersion of amorphous ritonavir in a matrix including a water soluble polymer
  2. Solid dispersion
  3. Solid solution
  4. Molecular dispersion
  5. Self-emulsifying
  6. Composition

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morris James LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Morris James LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Morris James LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide