Claims Are Construed In Computer Technology Case

Morris James LLP
Contact

Intellectual Ventures I, LLC, et al. v. Symantec Corp., C.A. No. 13-440 – LPS, March 10, 2016.

Stark, C. J.   Claim construction opinion issues regarding eleven terms from two patents.  A Markman hearing took place on February 9, 2015

The disputed technology relates data transmission and storage. The following terms were considered:

  1. “data transfer unit/DTU”
  2. “substantially concurrent copy of data”
  3. “spoof packet”
  4. “the group consisting of .. and …”
  5. ‘local persistent storage device/LPSD”
  6. “remote persistent storage device located remotely from the device”
  7. “device driver for the LPSD/the device driver”
  8. “performed substantially concurrently”
  9. “bandwidth”
  10. “claim 23 (as used in claim 27)”
  11. “non-data request”

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morris James LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Morris James LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Morris James LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide