Claims Are Construed Regarding Synthetic Elastomers

Morris James LLP
Contact

Andover Healthcare, Inc. v 3M Company, C.A. No. 13-843-LPS, May 11, 2015

Stark, C.J.  Claim construction opinion issues regarding 6 terms from one patent.  A Markman hearing and tutorial took place on March 6, 2015.

The court construed the following terms:

  1. Cohesive
  2. Synthetic
  3. Comprising / comprises (parties agree to “including but not limited to” instruction)
  4. An elastomer having an inherently crystalline structure / elastomer inherently capable of crystallization / inherently crystalline elastomer
  5. Crystalline structure / crystalline
  6. A cohesive elastomeric solid

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morris James LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Morris James LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Morris James LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide