CMS Proposes New Stark Exception: Recruitment of Non-Physician Practitioners

Tucker Arensberg, P.C.
Contact

In July 2015, CMS released proposals to provide several new Stark Law exceptions and to clarify issues regarding existing exceptions.  Over the next few days, I will post comments on what I consider the most significant new exceptions and clarifications.  The full text of these proposals and CMS comments and explanations are available at:

https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2015/07/15/2015-16875/medicare-program-revisions-to-payment-policies-under-the-physician-fee-schedule-and-other-revisions

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-07-15/pdf/2015-16875.pdf

New Recruitment of Non-Physician Practitioners Exception

CMS has proposed to establish a new exception as 42 C.F.R. § 411.357(x) to permit remuneration from a hospital, a federally qualified health center (FQHC), or a rural health center (RHC) to a physician to assist the physician in employing a non-physician practitioner in the geographic area served by the hospital, FQHC, or RHC providing the remuneration.

  1. The proposed exception would apply only where the non-physician practitioner is a bona fide employee of the physician receiving the remuneration from the hospital (or of the physician’s practice) and the purpose of the employment is primarily to provide primary care services to patients of the physician practice.  CMS believes employment is greater proof a sincere commitment then just an independent contractor relationship.
  2. Primary care services includes general family practice, general internal medicine, pediatrics, geriatrics, and obstetrics and gynecology patient care services.
  3. “Non-physician practitioner” is defined for purposes of this exception, to include only physician assistants, nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, and certified nurse midwives.
  4. There is a 2-year limit on the assistance which is intended to prevent ongoing payment to the physician that could serve as a reward for past referrals or an inducement to continue making referrals to the hospital, FQHC, or RHC, and the amount is proposed to not exceed 50% of actual salary, signing bonus and benefits or the amount equal to the excess of these costs over actual NPP receipts.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Tucker Arensberg, P.C. | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Tucker Arensberg, P.C.
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Tucker Arensberg, P.C. on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide