Court Holds California Statute Does Not Bar Insurance for Defense Of Criminal Actions Filed By Federal Prosecutors

Allen Matkins
Contact

California Insurance Code Section 553.5(b) prohibits insurers from providing a defense for certain types of claims, including criminal claims.  Does statute preclude a defense for all criminal claims or just some?  In Mt. Hawley Ins. Co. v. Lopez,  215 Cal. App. 4th 1385 (2013), the Court of Appeal considered the question at some length.  After finding that the statute was susceptible to not two, but three, plausible interpretations, the Court concluded that Section 553.5(b) does not preclude an insurer from agreeing to provide a defense for criminal actions against its insured brought by federal prosecutors.

The opinion, written by Judge John Segal of the Los Angeles Superior Court, includes a lengthy exegesis that finds support in the indemnification provisions of the Corporations Code:

Corporations Code section 317 applies to criminal proceedings against the agent as long as “that person acted in good faith and in a manner the person reasonably believed to be in the best interests of the corporation and, in the case of a criminal proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe the conduct of the person was unlawful.”

If you’re wondering why the opinion was written by a judge and not a justice, Judge Segal was sitting by assignment of the Chief Justice pursuant to Article VI, Section 6 of the California Constitution (“The Chief Justice shall seek to expedite judicial business and to equalize the work of judges.  The Chief Justice may provide for the assignment of any judge to another court but only with the judge’s consent if the court is of lower jurisdiction.  A retired judge who consents may be assigned to any court.”)

“If you turn away from disease, death or penury, you will be unfortunate.”

Yesterday, The Wall Street Journal wrote that a risk averse culture is infecting American workers and entrepreneurs.  Risk is a four letter word, but it isn’t a bad thing.  As I noted in this post, risk should be viewed as a range of both negative and positive outcomes.

The quotation above is my translation from Chapter 2 of the Enchiridion (Handbook) of Epictetus: “??s?? d? ?? ???????? ? ???at?? ? pe??a?, d?st???se??”.  For those not familiar with this book, it is a wonderful compilation of second century advice on how to be happy from a stoic’s viewpoint.

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Allen Matkins

Written by:

Allen Matkins
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Allen Matkins on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide