Court Recommends Denying Untimely Motion To Amend

Morris James LLP
Contact

GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al. v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Inc., USA, C.A. No. 14-877-LPS-CJB, December 15, 2016.

Burke, M.J. Magistrate recommends that defendant’s motion to amend to assert equitable defenses be denied.

Defendant seeks to add the defenses of laches and equitable estoppel. It filed its motion to amend eight months after the deadline for amending pleadings. These defenses are based on facts known to the parties for quite some time, including the fact the 6 years passed after the issuance of the asserted patent before suit was filed. Defendant’s argument that it has shown good cause because it has new counsel does not excuse the lack of diligence.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morris James LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Morris James LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Morris James LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide