Courts Begin To Split On Whistleblower Protection

Stinson - Corporate & Securities Law Blog
Contact

The Fifth Circuit has held in Asadi v. G.E. Energy (USA), LLC that a whistleblower must provide information to the SEC in order to be protected by the Dodd-Frank anti-retaliation provisions.  The reasoning is pretty simple.  That’s the way the statute defines the term “whistleblower.”  The Court went as far as to reject the definition of “whistleblower” in the SEC’s rules.

We understand this to be the first appellate court decision on the issue.  As we have noted, district courts have ruled differently on the issue.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Stinson - Corporate & Securities Law Blog | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Stinson - Corporate & Securities Law Blog
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Stinson - Corporate & Securities Law Blog on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide