CPSC Recall Snapshot: December 2016

Alston & Bird
Contact

Welcome to the December edition of the Alston & Bird CPSC Recall Snapshot.

There has been another twist in the rare earth magnet saga. In November, the Tenth Circuit threw out the CPSC’s rule that restricted the size and strength of rare earth magnets. In vacating the rule, the Tenth Circuit found that the CPSC did not meet its burden to weigh the costs and benefits of the rule to determine whether the rule was justified. Specifically, the court found that the data behind the rule did not reflect market changes created by the CPSC’s recent compliance activities. The court also cited the fact that the injury reports the CPSC relied on only “possibly” related to magnets, which the court found to be insufficient. The Tenth Circuit’s ruling came after an administrative law judge found that the magnets of the sole company still selling them were not inherently dangerous.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Alston & Bird

Written by:

Alston & Bird
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Alston & Bird on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide