Daubert and summary judgment rulings issue

Morris James LLP
Contact

Masimo Corporation v. Philips Electronics North America Corporation et al., C.A. Nos. 09-80-LPS, 11-742, October 31, 2016 (redacted November 3, 2016).

Stark, C. J. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and Daubert motions are granted in part and denied in part. Defendants’ cross-motion for summary judgment and Daubert motions are granted in part and denied in part. The disputed technology relates to various saturation and pulse rate algorithms and a patient monitoring system that includes a portable monitoring device and a docking station.  The experts’ testimony was challenged inter alia on the basis of Panduit, lost profits on consumables, functional unit test, legal effect of an OEM agreement, European Office Proceedings, and reasonable royalty.  Summary judgment rulings address infringement, invalidity, damages, doctrine of equivalents, willfulness, and indefiniteness.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morris James LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Morris James LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Morris James LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide