DEI Executive Orders Partially Blocked: What’s In and What’s Out, For Now . . .

PilieroMazza PLLC
Contact

PilieroMazza PLLC

On February 21, 2025, a federal court[1] preliminarily blocked the Trump administration from enforcing key provisions of the recent executive orders (EOs) to eliminate “illegal” diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs and initiatives from the federal government and federal contractors. The court found the provisions to be unconstitutionally vague and likely to infringe on free speech. This PilieroMazza client alert outlines the current status of the EOs and potential impacts on federal contractors.

EOs 14151 and 14173, issued by the Trump administration on January 20 and 21, respectively, required termination of all contracts or grants that included diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA) mandates, policies, programs, preferences, and activities. It also terminated any federal government employee position or organization related to DEIA efforts, directed the Attorney General to prosecute private sector entities that maintain DEIA programs, and required certification by federal contractors that they discontinued all “illegal” DEIA programs. See PilieroMazza’s client alert here.

The U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland found these aspects of the EOs overly broad because they failed to define key terms such as DEIA or to advise contractors on what constitutes an “illegal DEI” program. The ruling gives some reprieve to organizations promoting DEIA and provides at least temporary relief for federal contractors and subcontractors and other private employers who were faced with a high degree of uncertainty regarding the prospect of False Claims Act liability for false certification without any guidance as to what an illegal DEIA program might be. Other civil rights organizations filed challenges in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia and the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against the two DEI EOs and another EO that rejected gender identity. 

It is important to note that certain aspects of the EOs (and related EOs) are still in place; for example, the aspects of EO 14173 revoking EO 11246 and stripping the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs of many of its responsibilities.  The Trump administration is expected to appeal the ruling.

[1] National Association of Diversity Officers in Higher Education et al. v. Trump et al., Dkt. No. 1:25-cv-00333 (D. Md. Feb. 21, 2025) (NADOHE v. Trump).

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© PilieroMazza PLLC

Written by:

PilieroMazza PLLC
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

PilieroMazza PLLC on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide