Deja Vu or Something New? Shrinking NLRB Delegates Its Authority to the General Counsel

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP
Contact

It's déjà vu for the National Labor Relations Board. With Member Craig Becker's recess appointment set to expire on December 31, the federal agency responsible for conducting union elections and processing unfair labor practice charges must again prepare for the loss of its required quorum. Upon the expiration of Becker's term, the Board's membership will be reduced to two. Given the Supreme Court's decision last year in New Process Steel v. NLRB – in which the Court held that the NLRB's grant of authority depends on a minimum of three members – the Board must again anticipate the loss of its powers under the National Labor Relations Act, and the resulting stagnation of the agency's highest authority.

This problem is not new, and neither is the Board's solution. On Wednesday, the Board published an Order in the Federal Register, delegating two broad areas of authority to the General Counsel. This is the third time the Board has undertaken such a delegation. Faced with a loss of membership in December 2001, the Board published a similar Order, providing the General Counsel with authority over legal proceedings, including the ability to prosecute injunction proceedings under section 10(j) of the Act (federal orders requiring an employer to bargain with a union). Finding itself short of members again the next year, in November 2002, the Board made an additional delegation, this time granting the General Counsel the authority to certify the results of certain secret ballot elections. Both orders specify that these powers come into effect whenever the Board's membership falls below the required three members, and will remain vested in the General Counsel until such time as the Board's minimum membership is again met.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide