Discovery Dispute Regarding Key Word Searches Is Granted In Part And Denied In Part

Morris James LLP
Contact

AVM Technologies, LLC v. Intel Corporation, C.A. No. 15-33 – RGA-MPT, May 3, 2016.

Thynge, C. M. J. Plaintiff’s request for documents in discovery is granted in part and denied in part.

Plaintiff requests that defendant search its database for documents containing the following terms: charge sharing, power race, contention, and short circuits and their synonyms.  Plaintiff justifies this discovery on the basis of defendant’s reliance on a particular processor as prior art. It seeks documents on products that are not accused and that predate the accused products. Plaintiff accepted defendants offer to further search a previously searched database. Defendant is transferring potentially searchable contents of this database to a search capable platform to perform the keyword searches requested.  Plaintiff’s request for defendant to search databases devoted to specific projects is denied since there are no known databases that contain comprehensive documents for prior  art.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Morris James LLP

Written by:

Morris James LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Morris James LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide