Discretion is the Better Part of Valor; Court Dismisses Clean Water Act Citizen Suit Challenging POTW’s Enforcement Discretion

Foley Hoag LLP - Environmental Law
Contact

Foley Hoag LLP - Environmental Law

The scope of suits available to private citizens under the Clean Water Act is not unlimited.  A Federal District Court in Massachusetts recently made that clear in dismissing a citizen suit filed by the Conservation Law Foundation against the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, which operates Boston’s Deer Island Sewage Treatment Plant, the second largest treatment plant in the country.  (Full disclosure: I represented the MWRA in that suit.) The Court rejected CLF’s claims that the MWRA was required to take enforcement action against every industrial user that discharged to the MWRA’s sewer system in violation of pretreatment regulations.

The Court rejected the Complaint on two grounds, but the first is likely to be more interesting and to potentially have broader effect nationwide.   The Court ruled, on an issue of first impression, that only EPA and not private citizens can seek redress for alleged deficiencies in the way a POTW enforces its pretreatment regulations.  This resulted from a careful analysis of the interplay between 33 U.S.C. §1365, which authorizes citizen suits, and 33 U.S.C. §1319(f), which specifically gives EPA the authority to take action if the POTW is not sufficiently enforcing its pretreatment regulations.  Looking at the language of the statute and the policy considerations, the Court held:

“Thus, while the role of the citizen as an adjunct to EPA’s primary enforcement power is  estimable, it does not supplant the discretionary authority of the EPA Administrator, particularly in areas like the enforcement of an [Enforcement Response Plan], where consistency of purpose and predictability of result are the desirable  outcomes.”

As to the other ground, the Court found that the MWRA’s Enforcement Response Plan was discretionary and did not create mandatory obligations for enforcement.  As a result, the Court found that the MWRA’s NPDES Permit did not require it to take enforcement action in each instance of noncompliance by an industrial user.  The Court further found that the applicable pretreatment regulations “cannot be plausibly read to require a POTW to impose a sanction in every instance of a violation.”

Boston Harbor is now one of the cleanest urban harbors in the country, and we are proud of it.  Sitting on a dock, one can see whales and porpoises and, of course, watch the ships roll in and then watch them roll away again.

See video here.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Foley Hoag LLP - Environmental Law | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Foley Hoag LLP - Environmental Law
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Foley Hoag LLP - Environmental Law on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide