Disparagement Doesn’t Require Malice

Sherman & Howard L.L.C.
Contact

Sherman & Howard L.L.C.

The NLRB recently has upheld some of the most outrageous employee conduct because it viewed the conduct to be part and parcel of “protected, concerted activity”. An egregious example of this trend was the NLRB’s finding that a number of Jimmy John’s employees were improperly discharged for publicly disparaging the company’s product. Specifically, employees, at the direction of a union, distributed posters and otherwise publicly claimed that Jimmy John’s sandwiches were made by sick employees. Although the Supreme Court long ago held that such public disparagement of a company or brand was “unprotected,” the NLRB had more recently required employers to show that such disparagement was “malicious”. The 8th Circuit rejected the NLRB’s revised standard and refused to enforce the order – calling the sick employee posters what they are – unprotected public disparagement. Miklin Enterprises, Inc. v. NLRB, No. 14-3099 (8th Cir. July 3, 2017).

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Sherman & Howard L.L.C. | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Sherman & Howard L.L.C.
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Sherman & Howard L.L.C. on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide