DOJ settles with large bank for violating personal injury settlement terms

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Contact

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

On October 18, the DOJ reached a settlement agreement with a bank to resolve allegations related to the administration of certain trust accounts referred by a third-party bank. The settlement, involving a payment of $9,125,000 plus interest, addressed claims that the bank approved disbursements from trust accounts not in the beneficiaries’ best interests. The DOJ held this violated the terms of the trusts established for personal injury settlements involving lead poisoning victims.

The settlement agreement stipulated the bank will not charge any costs related to the settlement to government contracts and releases the bank from certain civil monetary claims under the FDI Act. However, it reserved the U.S. government’s right to pursue other claims, including criminal liability and administrative enforcement actions. The settlement agreement noted the bank denied these allegations.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

Written by:

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide