Don’t use forfeitures to reduce

Ary Rosenbaum - The Rosenbaum Law Firm P.C.
Contact

Ary Rosenbaum - The Rosenbaum Law Firm P.C.

There are plenty of cases out there, arguing that plan sponsors that use forfeitures to reduce employer contributions rather than paying administrative expenses are creating a fiduciary breach and a prohibited transaction.

While most of my clients won’t be subject to any type of litigation, I can see one day when the Department of Labor will opine that it’s impermissible to use forfeitures to reduce employer contributions when participants can pay less in fees if they’re used to offset plan expenses.

So plan sponsors need to be concerned more about saving on plan expenses for their participants than saving a couple of shekels with their employer contributions.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Ary Rosenbaum - The Rosenbaum Law Firm P.C.

Written by:

Ary Rosenbaum - The Rosenbaum Law Firm P.C.
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Ary Rosenbaum - The Rosenbaum Law Firm P.C. on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide